HRSMX vs. CSMCX
Compare and contrast key facts about Hood River Small-Cap Growth Fund (HRSMX) and Congress Small Cap Growth Fund (CSMCX).
HRSMX is managed by Hood River Capital Management. It was launched on Jan 2, 2003. CSMCX is managed by Congress. It was launched on Dec 9, 1999.
Performance
HRSMX vs. CSMCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HRSMX vs. CSMCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HRSMX Hood River Small-Cap Growth Fund | 5.38% | 23.85% | 35.48% | 21.52% | -27.99% | 23.19% | 60.80% | 24.13% | -6.91% | 20.60% |
CSMCX Congress Small Cap Growth Fund | -1.19% | 8.37% | 18.65% | 20.27% | -26.21% | 39.30% | 39.11% | 36.12% | 2.51% | 22.58% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HRSMX achieves a 5.38% return, which is significantly higher than CSMCX's -1.19% return. Over the past 10 years, HRSMX has outperformed CSMCX with an annualized return of 17.50%, while CSMCX has yielded a comparatively lower 15.16% annualized return.
HRSMX
- 1D
- 5.79%
- 1M
- -7.21%
- YTD
- 5.38%
- 6M
- 10.43%
- 1Y
- 54.19%
- 3Y*
- 26.46%
- 5Y*
- 10.91%
- 10Y*
- 17.50%
CSMCX
- 1D
- 3.10%
- 1M
- -8.10%
- YTD
- -1.19%
- 6M
- -5.08%
- 1Y
- 16.76%
- 3Y*
- 11.10%
- 5Y*
- 6.79%
- 10Y*
- 15.16%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HRSMX vs. CSMCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HRSMX has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than CSMCX's 1.00% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HRSMX vs. CSMCX — Risk / Return Rank
HRSMX
CSMCX
HRSMX vs. CSMCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hood River Small-Cap Growth Fund (HRSMX) and Congress Small Cap Growth Fund (CSMCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HRSMX | CSMCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.79 | 0.71 | +1.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.38 | 1.18 | +1.20 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.15 | +0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.49 | 1.30 | +2.19 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.94 | 4.06 | +9.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HRSMX | CSMCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.79 | 0.71 | +1.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | 0.31 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.56 | -0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between HRSMX and CSMCX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
HRSMX vs. CSMCX - Dividend Comparison
HRSMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.01%, more than CSMCX's 2.37% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HRSMX Hood River Small-Cap Growth Fund | 4.01% | 4.23% | 3.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 19.96% | 6.28% | 0.00% | 4.59% | 6.74% | 0.00% | 5.73% |
CSMCX Congress Small Cap Growth Fund | 2.37% | 2.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 15.57% | 7.05% | 16.14% | 10.04% | 11.48% | 0.00% | 27.40% |
Drawdowns
HRSMX vs. CSMCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HRSMX drawdown since its inception was -64.92%, which is greater than CSMCX's maximum drawdown of -56.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HRSMX and CSMCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HRSMX | CSMCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.92% | -56.20% | -8.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.89% | -13.63% | -1.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.49% | -33.44% | -5.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.74% | -33.44% | -7.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.21% | -10.95% | +3.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.16% | -9.44% | -3.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.73% | 4.38% | -0.65% |
Volatility
HRSMX vs. CSMCX - Volatility Comparison
Hood River Small-Cap Growth Fund (HRSMX) has a higher volatility of 12.35% compared to Congress Small Cap Growth Fund (CSMCX) at 7.65%. This indicates that HRSMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSMCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HRSMX | CSMCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.35% | 7.65% | +4.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.73% | 15.43% | +6.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.18% | 24.70% | +5.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.18% | 22.35% | +4.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.82% | 22.31% | +3.51% |