PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HRSMX vs. FTXNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HRSMX vs. FTXNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hood River Small-Cap Growth Fund (HRSMX) and Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Cap Growth Fund (FTXNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with HRSMX having a 37.89% return and FTXNX slightly higher at 39.76%.


HRSMX

1D
0.34%
1M
3.33%
YTD
37.89%
6M
34.28%
1Y
76.99%
3Y*
36.34%
5Y*
15.90%
10Y*
21.05%

FTXNX

1D
1.68%
1M
7.17%
YTD
39.76%
6M
36.74%
1Y
71.86%
3Y*
32.30%
5Y*
15.53%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HRSMX vs. FTXNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
HRSMX
Hood River Small-Cap Growth Fund
37.89%23.85%35.48%21.52%-27.99%23.19%60.80%24.13%-10.15%
FTXNX
Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Cap Growth Fund
39.76%12.10%28.50%32.77%-27.66%25.16%50.97%18.83%-3.91%

Correlation

The correlation between HRSMX and FTXNX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2018

0.92

The correlation between HRSMX and FTXNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HRSMX vs. FTXNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HRSMX
HRSMX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
HRSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HRSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
HRSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
HRSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
HRSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

FTXNX
FTXNX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
FTXNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTXNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTXNX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
FTXNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTXNX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HRSMX vs. FTXNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hood River Small-Cap Growth Fund (HRSMX) and Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Cap Growth Fund (FTXNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HRSMXFTXNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.42

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.45

5.86

+0.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

25.94

23.12

+2.82

HRSMX vs. FTXNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HRSMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.87, which is comparable to the FTXNX Sharpe Ratio of 2.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HRSMX and FTXNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HRSMX vs. FTXNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HRSMX drawdown since its inception was -64.92%, which is greater than FTXNX's maximum drawdown of -45.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HRSMX and FTXNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HRSMXFTXNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.92%

-45.22%

-19.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.29%

-12.41%

+0.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.04%

-32.39%

-0.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.49%

-39.68%

+1.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.05%

-12.52%

-0.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.05%

3.14%

-0.09%

Volatility

HRSMX vs. FTXNX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hood River Small-Cap Growth Fund (HRSMX) is 9.09%, while Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Cap Growth Fund (FTXNX) has a volatility of 9.73%. This indicates that HRSMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTXNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HRSMXFTXNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.09%

9.73%

-0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.09%

21.69%

+0.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.66%

27.42%

+0.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.48%

26.99%

+0.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.09%

27.78%

-1.69%

HRSMX vs. FTXNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HRSMX has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is lower than FTXNX's 1.44% expense ratio.


Dividends

HRSMX vs. FTXNX - Dividend Comparison

HRSMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.07%, while FTXNX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTXNX
Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Cap Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%17.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HRSMX
Hood River Small-Cap Growth Fund
3.07%4.23%3.75%0.00%0.00%19.96%6.28%0.00%4.59%6.74%0.00%5.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


HRSMX and FTXNX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTXNX has higher volatility (9.73%) compared to HRSMX (9.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HRSMX dropped -64.92% vs FTXNX's -45.22%.

HRSMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.87 vs 2.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HRSMX and FTXNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer