PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WMCVX vs. HASCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WMCVX vs. HASCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wasatch Small Cap Value Fund (WMCVX) and Harbor Small Cap Value Fund (HASCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WMCVX achieves a 8.15% return, which is significantly lower than HASCX's 25.78% return. Over the past 10 years, WMCVX has underperformed HASCX with an annualized return of 10.38%, while HASCX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.58% annualized return.


WMCVX

1D
-0.51%
1M
-0.41%
YTD
8.15%
6M
6.68%
1Y
11.90%
3Y*
13.15%
5Y*
4.19%
10Y*
10.38%

HASCX

1D
-0.30%
1M
-0.41%
YTD
25.78%
6M
23.36%
1Y
42.38%
3Y*
16.12%
5Y*
8.55%
10Y*
11.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WMCVX vs. HASCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WMCVX
Wasatch Small Cap Value Fund
8.15%-3.66%11.65%31.78%-21.61%25.23%12.52%23.63%-9.55%19.54%
HASCX
Harbor Small Cap Value Fund
25.78%3.78%10.93%15.18%-9.59%14.55%13.15%28.97%-16.16%21.63%

Correlation

The correlation between WMCVX and HASCX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2001

0.92

The correlation between WMCVX and HASCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WMCVX vs. HASCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WMCVX
WMCVX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
WMCVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WMCVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
WMCVX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
WMCVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
WMCVX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

HASCX
HASCX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
HASCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HASCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
HASCX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
HASCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
HASCX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WMCVX vs. HASCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wasatch Small Cap Value Fund (WMCVX) and Harbor Small Cap Value Fund (HASCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WMCVXHASCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.37

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.01

4.25

-3.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.81

14.60

-11.79

WMCVX vs. HASCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WMCVX Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is lower than the HASCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WMCVX and HASCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WMCVXHASCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

2.18

-1.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

0.41

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.51

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.46

+0.05

Drawdowns

WMCVX vs. HASCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WMCVX drawdown since its inception was -65.79%, which is greater than HASCX's maximum drawdown of -58.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMCVX and HASCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WMCVXHASCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.79%

-58.90%

-6.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.06%

-9.89%

-2.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.75%

-28.34%

-0.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.26%

-28.34%

-3.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.29%

-42.15%

-4.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.43%

-1.67%

-4.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.95%

-8.14%

-2.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.33%

2.88%

+1.45%

Volatility

WMCVX vs. HASCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Wasatch Small Cap Value Fund (WMCVX) is 5.38%, while Harbor Small Cap Value Fund (HASCX) has a volatility of 6.09%. This indicates that WMCVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HASCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WMCVXHASCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.38%

6.09%

-0.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.46%

14.55%

-1.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.62%

19.37%

-0.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.56%

20.73%

+1.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.47%

22.90%

+0.57%

WMCVX vs. HASCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WMCVX has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is higher than HASCX's 0.87% expense ratio.


Dividends

WMCVX vs. HASCX - Dividend Comparison

WMCVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.72%, more than HASCX's 2.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HASCX
Harbor Small Cap Value Fund
2.71%3.41%0.62%6.99%7.25%5.64%0.43%1.41%11.18%1.98%0.36%3.98%
WMCVX
Wasatch Small Cap Value Fund
5.72%6.19%17.18%3.67%2.39%7.72%0.00%1.10%8.98%6.63%0.07%0.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


WMCVX and HASCX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HASCX has higher volatility (6.09%) compared to WMCVX (5.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WMCVX dropped -65.79% vs HASCX's -58.90%.

HASCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WMCVX and HASCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer