WMCVX vs. DFISX
Compare and contrast key facts about Wasatch Small Cap Value Fund (WMCVX) and DFA International Small Company Portfolio (DFISX).
WMCVX is managed by Wasatch. It was launched on Dec 17, 1997. DFISX is managed by Dimensional. It was launched on Sep 30, 1996.
Performance
WMCVX vs. DFISX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
WMCVX vs. DFISX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WMCVX Wasatch Small Cap Value Fund | -1.67% | -3.66% | 11.65% | 31.78% | -21.61% | 25.23% | 12.52% | 23.63% | -9.55% | 19.54% |
DFISX DFA International Small Company Portfolio | -1.97% | 36.35% | 3.76% | 14.46% | -17.13% | 10.71% | 9.27% | 24.18% | -19.42% | 24.78% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WMCVX achieves a -1.67% return, which is significantly higher than DFISX's -1.97% return. Over the past 10 years, WMCVX has outperformed DFISX with an annualized return of 9.73%, while DFISX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.66% annualized return.
WMCVX
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- -10.47%
- YTD
- -1.67%
- 6M
- -5.46%
- 1Y
- 4.82%
- 3Y*
- 9.70%
- 5Y*
- 3.46%
- 10Y*
- 9.73%
DFISX
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- -11.77%
- YTD
- -1.97%
- 6M
- 2.11%
- 1Y
- 26.89%
- 3Y*
- 14.28%
- 5Y*
- 6.58%
- 10Y*
- 7.66%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
WMCVX vs. DFISX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WMCVX has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is higher than DFISX's 0.39% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
WMCVX vs. DFISX — Risk / Return Rank
WMCVX
DFISX
WMCVX vs. DFISX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wasatch Small Cap Value Fund (WMCVX) and DFA International Small Company Portfolio (DFISX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WMCVX | DFISX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.21 | 1.66 | -1.45 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.48 | 2.15 | -1.67 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.33 | -0.26 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.20 | 2.04 | -1.84 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.60 | 7.97 | -7.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WMCVX | DFISX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 | 1.66 | -1.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 | 0.42 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | 0.48 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.44 | +0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between WMCVX and DFISX is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
WMCVX vs. DFISX - Dividend Comparison
WMCVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.29%, more than DFISX's 3.21% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WMCVX Wasatch Small Cap Value Fund | 6.29% | 6.19% | 17.18% | 3.67% | 2.39% | 7.72% | 0.00% | 1.10% | 8.98% | 6.63% | 0.07% | 0.52% |
DFISX DFA International Small Company Portfolio | 3.21% | 3.19% | 3.39% | 3.01% | 3.51% | 3.06% | 1.71% | 4.54% | 7.74% | 1.27% | 4.44% | 4.47% |
Drawdowns
WMCVX vs. DFISX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WMCVX drawdown since its inception was -65.79%, which is greater than DFISX's maximum drawdown of -60.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMCVX and DFISX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| WMCVX | DFISX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.79% | -60.66% | -5.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.67% | -11.96% | -1.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.26% | -35.06% | +2.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.29% | -43.00% | -3.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.92% | -11.77% | -3.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.98% | -11.69% | +0.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.61% | 3.06% | +1.55% |
Volatility
WMCVX vs. DFISX - Volatility Comparison
Wasatch Small Cap Value Fund (WMCVX) has a higher volatility of 6.29% compared to DFA International Small Company Portfolio (DFISX) at 5.90%. This indicates that WMCVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFISX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| WMCVX | DFISX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.29% | 5.90% | +0.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.37% | 10.04% | +3.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.40% | 15.38% | +8.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.53% | 15.75% | +6.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.39% | 16.11% | +7.28% |