PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WMBDX vs. UMMGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WMBDX vs. UMMGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WesMark Government Bond Fund (WMBDX) and Columbia Bond Fund (UMMGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


WMBDX

1D
0.13%
1M
0.43%
YTD
0.10%
6M
0.01%
1Y
5.07%
3Y*
3.38%
5Y*
-1.86%
10Y*
-0.19%

UMMGX

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WMBDX vs. UMMGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WMBDX
WesMark Government Bond Fund
0.10%6.94%0.91%2.69%-17.48%-1.45%3.62%4.74%0.80%1.29%
UMMGX
Columbia Bond Fund
0.03%8.03%2.06%6.73%-15.66%-0.79%9.10%9.23%-0.50%3.73%

Correlation

The correlation between WMBDX and UMMGX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 1998

0.86

The correlation between WMBDX and UMMGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.82 (1 year) to 0.94 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WMBDX vs. UMMGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WMBDX
WMBDX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
WMBDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WMBDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
WMBDX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
WMBDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
WMBDX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

UMMGX
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WMBDX vs. UMMGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WesMark Government Bond Fund (WMBDX) and Columbia Bond Fund (UMMGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WMBDXUMMGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.54

WMBDX vs. UMMGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WMBDXUMMGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

Drawdowns

WMBDX vs. UMMGX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WMBDXUMMGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.12%

Volatility

WMBDX vs. UMMGX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WMBDXUMMGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.73%

WMBDX vs. UMMGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WMBDX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than UMMGX's 0.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

WMBDX vs. UMMGX - Dividend Comparison

WMBDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%, more than UMMGX's 3.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UMMGX
Columbia Bond Fund
3.41%4.20%3.70%3.73%2.73%1.76%4.77%4.21%2.71%1.88%4.66%3.56%
WMBDX
WesMark Government Bond Fund
3.57%3.49%3.50%3.22%1.40%1.26%2.06%2.07%1.70%2.01%1.85%1.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


WMBDX and UMMGX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WMBDX and UMMGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer