WMBDX vs. FMBPX
Compare and contrast key facts about WesMark Government Bond Fund (WMBDX) and Federated Hermes Mortgage Strategy Portfolio (FMBPX).
WMBDX is managed by WesMark. It was launched on Apr 20, 1998. FMBPX is managed by Federated. It was launched on Dec 20, 2007.
Performance
WMBDX vs. FMBPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
WMBDX vs. FMBPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WMBDX WesMark Government Bond Fund | -0.55% | 6.94% | 0.90% | 2.69% | -17.48% | -1.45% | 3.62% | 4.74% | 0.80% | 1.29% |
FMBPX Federated Hermes Mortgage Strategy Portfolio | -0.18% | 9.03% | 1.04% | 4.44% | -12.21% | -1.35% | 4.77% | 6.30% | 1.13% | 2.76% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WMBDX achieves a -0.55% return, which is significantly lower than FMBPX's -0.18% return. Over the past 10 years, WMBDX has underperformed FMBPX with an annualized return of -0.21%, while FMBPX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.45% annualized return.
WMBDX
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- -2.47%
- YTD
- -0.55%
- 6M
- 0.45%
- 1Y
- 3.15%
- 3Y*
- 2.81%
- 5Y*
- -1.87%
- 10Y*
- -0.21%
FMBPX
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- -2.19%
- YTD
- -0.18%
- 6M
- 1.51%
- 1Y
- 5.46%
- 3Y*
- 3.90%
- 5Y*
- 0.19%
- 10Y*
- 1.45%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
WMBDX vs. FMBPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WMBDX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than FMBPX's 0.02% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
WMBDX vs. FMBPX — Risk / Return Rank
WMBDX
FMBPX
WMBDX vs. FMBPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WesMark Government Bond Fund (WMBDX) and Federated Hermes Mortgage Strategy Portfolio (FMBPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WMBDX | FMBPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.79 | 1.25 | -0.47 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.12 | 1.87 | -0.76 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.26 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.37 | 2.11 | -0.74 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.60 | 5.85 | -2.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WMBDX | FMBPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 | 1.25 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.31 | 0.03 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.05 | 0.29 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.25 | +0.33 |
Correlation
The correlation between WMBDX and FMBPX is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
WMBDX vs. FMBPX - Dividend Comparison
WMBDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.24%, less than FMBPX's 4.60% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WMBDX WesMark Government Bond Fund | 3.24% | 3.49% | 3.48% | 3.22% | 1.40% | 1.26% | 2.06% | 2.07% | 1.70% | 2.01% | 1.85% | 1.52% |
FMBPX Federated Hermes Mortgage Strategy Portfolio | 4.60% | 4.87% | 4.29% | 3.46% | 2.29% | 1.96% | 2.68% | 3.23% | 3.14% | 2.83% | 2.72% | 2.65% |
Drawdowns
WMBDX vs. FMBPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WMBDX drawdown since its inception was -24.94%, which is greater than FMBPX's maximum drawdown of -18.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMBDX and FMBPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| WMBDX | FMBPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.94% | -18.34% | -6.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.10% | -3.15% | +0.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.84% | -18.02% | -6.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.94% | -18.34% | -6.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.89% | -2.19% | -8.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.14% | -3.29% | +0.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.18% | 1.13% | +0.05% |
Volatility
WMBDX vs. FMBPX - Volatility Comparison
WesMark Government Bond Fund (WMBDX) has a higher volatility of 1.67% compared to Federated Hermes Mortgage Strategy Portfolio (FMBPX) at 1.53%. This indicates that WMBDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMBPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| WMBDX | FMBPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.67% | 1.53% | +0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.87% | 3.02% | -0.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.76% | 5.44% | -0.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.07% | 6.72% | -0.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.70% | 5.08% | -0.38% |