PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WLY vs. PSO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

WLY vs. PSO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Wiley & Sons (WLY) and Pearson plc (PSO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WLY achieves a 50.13% return, which is significantly higher than PSO's 9.72% return.


WLY

1D
2.89%
1M
7.15%
YTD
50.13%
6M
48.57%
1Y
9.25%
3Y*
17.46%
5Y*
10Y*

PSO

1D
0.46%
1M
-0.46%
YTD
9.72%
6M
8.71%
1Y
7.12%
3Y*
16.26%
5Y*
7.73%
10Y*
5.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WLY vs. PSO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
WLY
John Wiley & Sons
50.13%-27.22%42.19%-17.53%-22.85%
PSO
Pearson plc
9.72%-11.20%34.16%12.00%13.88%

Correlation

The correlation between WLY and PSO is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2022

0.29

Fundamentals

Market Cap

WLY:

$2.43B

PSO:

$9.85B

EPS

WLY:

$4.15

PSO:

£1.16

PE Ratio

WLY:

10.97

PSO:

9.88

PEG Ratio

WLY:

0.09

PSO:

0.39

PS Ratio

WLY:

1.45

PSO:

1.07

PB Ratio

WLY:

0.94

PSO:

2.05

Total Revenue (TTM)

WLY:

$1.68B

PSO:

£7.12B

Gross Profit (TTM)

WLY:

$1.25B

PSO:

£3.66B

EBITDA (TTM)

WLY:

$258.93M

PSO:

£2.01B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WLY vs. PSO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WLY
WLY Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
WLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
WLY Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
WLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
WLY Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

PSO
PSO Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
PSO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSO Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
PSO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSO Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WLY vs. PSO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Wiley & Sons (WLY) and Pearson plc (PSO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WLYPSODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.08

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.27

0.36

-0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.51

0.82

-0.31

WLY vs. PSO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WLY Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is comparable to the PSO Sharpe Ratio of 0.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WLY and PSO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WLY vs. PSO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WLY drawdown since its inception was -43.95%, smaller than the maximum PSO drawdown of -74.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WLY and PSO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WLYPSODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.95%

-74.78%

+30.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.42%

-19.64%

-14.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.27%

-30.73%

-12.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.39%

-11.51%

+2.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.67%

-36.51%

+13.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.26%

8.67%

+9.59%

Volatility

WLY vs. PSO - Volatility Comparison

John Wiley & Sons (WLY) has a higher volatility of 9.65% compared to Pearson plc (PSO) at 5.42%. This indicates that WLY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WLYPSODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.65%

5.42%

+4.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.41%

19.06%

+5.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.05%

23.27%

+10.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.52%

28.42%

+6.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.52%

31.95%

+2.57%

Dividends

WLY vs. PSO - Dividend Comparison

WLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%, more than PSO's 2.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PSO
Pearson plc
2.14%2.12%1.82%2.21%2.40%3.27%2.74%2.90%1.96%5.14%7.28%7.48%
WLY
John Wiley & Sons
3.12%4.63%3.22%4.40%3.46%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

WLY vs. PSO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between John Wiley & Sons and Pearson plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B20222023202420252026
447.94M
1.84B
(WLY) Total Revenue
(PSO) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. WLY values in USD, PSO values in GBP

WLY vs. PSO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between John Wiley & Sons and Pearson plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
84.3%
52.9%
Portfolio components
WLY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, John Wiley & Sons reported a gross profit of 377.66M and revenue of 447.94M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 84.3%.

PSO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Pearson plc reported a gross profit of 974.95M and revenue of 1.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.9%.

WLY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, John Wiley & Sons reported an operating income of 94.02M and revenue of 447.94M, resulting in an operating margin of 21.0%.

PSO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Pearson plc reported an operating income of 273.30M and revenue of 1.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.8%.

WLY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, John Wiley & Sons reported a net income of 135.35M and revenue of 447.94M, resulting in a net margin of 30.2%.

PSO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Pearson plc reported a net income of 169.95M and revenue of 1.84B, resulting in a net margin of 9.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


WLY and PSO have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WLY has higher volatility (9.65%) compared to PSO (5.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WLY dropped -43.95% vs PSO's -74.78%.

PSO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.31 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WLY and PSO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer