WLY vs. GHC
WLY (John Wiley & Sons) and GHC (Graham Holdings Company) are both stocks. WLY operates in Publishing (Communication Services), while GHC operates in Education & Training Services (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 3 years, WLY returned 16.79%/yr vs 27.56%/yr for GHC. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
WLY vs. GHC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WLY achieves a 44.79% return, which is significantly higher than GHC's 4.89% return.
WLY
- 1D
- -2.33%
- 1M
- 3.78%
- YTD
- 44.79%
- 6M
- 43.61%
- 1Y
- 4.02%
- 3Y*
- 16.79%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GHC
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 3.97%
- YTD
- 4.89%
- 6M
- 3.78%
- 1Y
- 19.38%
- 3Y*
- 27.56%
- 5Y*
- 13.67%
- 10Y*
- 10.09%
WLY vs. GHC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WLY John Wiley & Sons | 44.79% | -27.22% | 42.19% | -17.53% | -22.85% |
GHC Graham Holdings Company | 4.89% | 26.98% | 26.32% | 16.56% | -0.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between WLY and GHC is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2022 | 0.43 |
The correlation between WLY and GHC shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (1 year) to 0.43 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
WLY:
$2.34B
GHC:
$7.60M
WLY:
$4.15
GHC:
$90.63
WLY:
10.58
GHC:
12.67
WLY:
0.09
GHC:
0.14
WLY:
1.40
GHC:
1.01
WLY:
0.90
GHC:
0.00
WLY:
$1.68B
GHC:
$3.75B
WLY:
$1.25B
GHC:
$1.10B
WLY:
$258.93M
GHC:
$722.08M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WLY vs. GHC — Risk / Return Rank
WLY
GHC
WLY vs. GHC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Wiley & Sons (WLY) and Graham Holdings Company (GHC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WLY | GHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.15 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.12 | 0.98 | -0.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.22 | 2.58 | -2.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WLY vs. GHC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WLY drawdown since its inception was -43.95%, smaller than the maximum GHC drawdown of -67.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WLY and GHC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WLY | GHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.95% | -67.54% | +23.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.42% | -19.78% | -14.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.27% | -19.78% | -23.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.52% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -62.55% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.62% | -3.47% | -9.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.69% | -19.29% | -3.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.26% | 7.54% | +10.72% |
Volatility
WLY vs. GHC - Volatility Comparison
John Wiley & Sons (WLY) has a higher volatility of 9.31% compared to Graham Holdings Company (GHC) at 6.51%. This indicates that WLY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GHC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WLY | GHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.31% | 6.51% | +2.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.28% | 16.58% | +7.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.99% | 26.83% | +7.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.53% | 26.11% | +8.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.53% | 28.29% | +6.24% |
Dividends
WLY vs. GHC - Dividend Comparison
WLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.23%, more than GHC's 0.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GHC Graham Holdings Company | 0.64% | 0.66% | 0.79% | 0.95% | 1.05% | 0.96% | 1.09% | 0.87% | 0.83% | 0.91% | 0.95% | 89.61% |
WLY John Wiley & Sons | 3.23% | 4.63% | 3.22% | 4.40% | 3.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
WLY vs. GHC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between John Wiley & Sons and Graham Holdings Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
WLY and GHC have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WLY has higher volatility (9.31%) compared to GHC (6.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WLY dropped -43.95% vs GHC's -67.54%.
GHC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.73 vs 0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WLY and GHC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer