PSO vs. LRN
PSO (Pearson plc) and LRN (Stride, Inc.) are both stocks. PSO operates in Publishing (Communication Services), while LRN operates in Education & Training Services (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, PSO returned 6.91%/yr vs 20.28%/yr for LRN. Their 0.21 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
PSO vs. LRN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with PSO having a 22.85% return and LRN slightly higher at 23.66%. Over the past 10 years, PSO has underperformed LRN with an annualized return of 6.91%, while LRN has yielded a comparatively higher 20.28% annualized return.
PSO
- 1D
- -2.70%
- 1M
- 1.38%
- 6M
- 31.06%
- YTD
- 22.85%
- 1Y
- 15.92%
- 3Y*
- 19.01%
- 5Y*
- 9.46%
- 10Y*
- 6.91%
- ALL TIME*
- 1.33%
LRN
- 1D
- -3.35%
- 1M
- -11.22%
- 6M
- -5.09%
- YTD
- 23.66%
- 1Y
- -37.88%
- 3Y*
- 27.37%
- 5Y*
- 21.23%
- 10Y*
- 20.28%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.33%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
LRN Stride, Inc. | $85.91M | $73.02M | $72.52M |
PSO Pearson plc | $12.43M | $14.13M | $13.55M |
PSO vs. LRN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSO Pearson plc | 22.85% | -11.20% | 34.16% | 12.00% | 37.70% | -6.13% | 13.24% | -27.76% | 24.26% | 4.53% |
LRN Stride, Inc. | 23.66% | -37.53% | 75.05% | 89.80% | -6.15% | 56.99% | 4.32% | -17.91% | 55.91% | -7.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSO and LRN is 0.39, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2007 | 0.21 |
The correlation between PSO and LRN shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (10 years) to 0.39 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
PSO:
$10.17B
LRN:
$3.41B
PSO:
£1.18
LRN:
$9.77
PSO:
10.67
LRN:
8.22
PSO:
0.42
LRN:
0.20
PSO:
1.15
LRN:
1.52
PSO:
2.25
LRN:
2.33
PSO:
£7.12B
LRN:
$2.54B
PSO:
£3.66B
LRN:
$972.24M
PSO:
£2.01B
LRN:
$424.60M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSO vs. LRN — Risk / Return Rank
PSO
LRN
PSO vs. LRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pearson plc (PSO) and Stride, Inc. (LRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PSO | LRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 0.95 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.13 | -0.59 | +1.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.60 | -0.82 | +3.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PSO vs. LRN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSO drawdown since its inception was -74.78%, smaller than the maximum LRN drawdown of -81.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSO and LRN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSO | LRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.78% | -81.41% | +6.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.49% | -64.07% | +44.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.73% | -64.07% | +33.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.82% | -64.07% | +33.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.32% | -64.07% | +5.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.97% | -52.72% | +48.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.39% | -36.36% | -0.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.46% | 45.54% | -37.08% |
Volatility
PSO vs. LRN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pearson plc (PSO) is 10.88%, while Stride, Inc. (LRN) has a volatility of 21.03%. This indicates that PSO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSO | LRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.88% | 21.03% | -10.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.54% | 32.25% | -13.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.50% | 70.91% | -45.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.78% | 51.90% | -23.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.94% | 49.67% | -17.73% |
Dividends
PSO vs. LRN - Dividend Comparison
PSO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, while LRN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LRN Stride, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PSO Pearson plc | 1.91% | 2.12% | 1.82% | 2.21% | 2.40% | 3.27% | 2.74% | 2.90% | 1.96% | 5.14% | 7.28% | 7.48% |
Financials
PSO vs. LRN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Pearson plc and Stride, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PSO vs. LRN - Profitability Comparison
PSO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Pearson plc reported a gross profit of 974.95M and revenue of 1.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.9%.
LRN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Stride, Inc. reported a gross profit of 231.56M and revenue of 629.87M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.
PSO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Pearson plc reported an operating income of 273.30M and revenue of 1.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.8%.
LRN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Stride, Inc. reported an operating income of 129.08M and revenue of 629.87M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.5%.
PSO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Pearson plc reported a net income of 169.95M and revenue of 1.84B, resulting in a net margin of 9.2%.
LRN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Stride, Inc. reported a net income of 248.49M and revenue of 629.87M, resulting in a net margin of 39.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PSO and LRN have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LRN has higher volatility (21.03%) compared to PSO (10.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSO dropped -74.78% vs LRN's -81.41%.
PSO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.86 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSO and LRN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer