WLTG vs. HCMT

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF (WLTG) and Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced U.S. Equity Strategy ETF (HCMT).

WLTG and HCMT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. WLTG is an actively managed fund by WealthTrust. It was launched on Dec 6, 2021. HCMT is an actively managed fund by Direxion. It was launched on Jun 21, 2023.

Performance

WLTG vs. HCMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF (WLTG) and Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced U.S. Equity Strategy ETF (HCMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

WLTG vs. HCMT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
WLTG WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF	-2.68%	24.55%	26.90%	9.83%
HCMT Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced U.S. Equity Strategy ETF	-8.58%	7.39%	39.14%	5.67%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WLTG achieves a -2.68% return, which is significantly higher than HCMT's -8.58% return.

WLTG

• 1D: 2.93%
• 1M: -5.29%
• YTD: -2.68%
• 6M: 1.42%
• 1Y: 25.35%
• 3Y*: 20.35%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HCMT

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: -6.60%
• YTD: -8.58%
• 6M: -5.95%
• 1Y: 17.04%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WLTG vs. HCMT - Expense Ratio Comparison

WLTG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than HCMT's 1.17% expense ratio.

HCMT

Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced U.S. Equity Strategy ETF

WLTG

WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF

Return for Risk

WLTG vs. HCMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WLTG

WLTG Risk / Return Rank: 83
WLTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
WLTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
WLTG Omega Ratio Rank: 80
WLTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
WLTG Martin Ratio Rank: 88

HCMT

HCMT Risk / Return Rank: 33
HCMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
HCMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
HCMT Omega Ratio Rank: 33
HCMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
HCMT Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WLTG vs. HCMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF (WLTG) and Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced U.S. Equity Strategy ETF (HCMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WLTG	HCMT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.53	0.58	+0.95
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.18	0.91	+1.26
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.13	+0.18
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.68	0.89	+1.79
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.01	2.48	+8.53
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WLTG vs. HCMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WLTG Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is higher than the HCMT Sharpe Ratio of 0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WLTG and HCMT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WLTG	HCMT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.53	0.58	+0.95
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.54	0.49	+0.05

Correlation

The correlation between WLTG and HCMT is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

WLTG vs. HCMT - Dividend Comparison

WLTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.55%, more than HCMT's 0.46% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
WLTG WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF	4.55%	4.43%	0.55%	0.71%	0.44%	0.02%
HCMT Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced U.S. Equity Strategy ETF	0.46%	0.43%	2.75%	0.63%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

WLTG vs. HCMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WLTG drawdown since its inception was -25.14%, smaller than the maximum HCMT drawdown of -36.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WLTG and HCMT.

Drawdown Indicators

	WLTG	HCMT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.14%	-36.26%	+11.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.56%	-19.31%	+9.75%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.91%	-13.50%	+6.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.40%	-8.33%	-1.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.33%	6.93%	-4.60%

Volatility

WLTG vs. HCMT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF (WLTG) is 5.68%, while Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced U.S. Equity Strategy ETF (HCMT) has a volatility of 7.70%. This indicates that WLTG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HCMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WLTG	HCMT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.68%	7.70%	-2.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.88%	20.08%	-9.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.70%	29.73%	-13.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.24%	29.03%	-13.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.24%	29.03%	-13.79%