WLTG vs. GXLC

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

WLTG (WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF) and GXLC (Global X U.S. 500 ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. WLTG is actively managed, while GXLC is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.94 means they have usually moved in the same direction. WLTG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for GXLC.

Performance

WLTG vs. GXLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF (WLTG) and Global X U.S. 500 ETF (GXLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WLTG achieves a 8.11% return, which is significantly lower than GXLC's 10.06% return.

WLTG

• 1D: 0.93%
• 1M: 1.25%
• 6M: 5.49%
• YTD: 8.11%
• 1Y: 22.07%
• 3Y*: 21.12%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 10.17%

GXLC

• 1D: 0.86%
• 1M: 0.20%
• 6M: 8.81%
• YTD: 10.06%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GXLC Global X U.S. 500 ETF	$27.98K	$20.23K	$17.31K
WLTG WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF	$600.93K	$345.27K	$433.54K

WLTG vs. GXLC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
WLTG WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF	8.11%	4.12%
GXLC Global X U.S. 500 ETF	10.06%	3.22%

Correlation

The correlation between WLTG and GXLC is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025	0.94

Return for Risk

WLTG vs. GXLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

WLTG

WLTG Risk / Return Rank: 61
WLTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
WLTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
WLTG Omega Ratio Rank: 56
WLTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
WLTG Martin Ratio Rank: 73

GXLC

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

WLTG vs. GXLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF (WLTG) and Global X U.S. 500 ETF (GXLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WLTG	GXLC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.40	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.99	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.10	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.05	—	—

Drawdowns

WLTG vs. GXLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WLTG drawdown since its inception was -25.14%, which is greater than GXLC's maximum drawdown of -9.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WLTG and GXLC.

Drawdown Indicators

	WLTG	GXLC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.14%	-9.08%	-16.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.56%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.12%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.26%	-1.48%	+1.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.80%	-1.58%	-7.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.22%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	WLTG	GXLC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.60%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.04%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.32%	13.60%	+0.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.14%	13.60%	+1.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.14%	13.60%	+1.54%

WLTG vs. GXLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

WLTG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than GXLC's 0.02% expense ratio.

Dividends

WLTG vs. GXLC - Dividend Comparison

WLTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.10%, more than GXLC's 0.64% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
GXLC Global X U.S. 500 ETF	0.64%	0.30%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
WLTG WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF	4.10%	4.43%	0.55%	0.71%	0.44%	0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WLTG and GXLC in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, WLTG and GXLC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, WLTG or GXLC?

On fees, GXLC is cheaper at 0.02% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, WLTG or GXLC?

GXLC is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for WLTG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WLTG or GXLC?

WLTG has the higher dividend yield at 4.10%, compared with 0.64% for GXLC.

What is the main difference between WLTG and GXLC?

They also come from different issuers: WealthTrust and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for WLTG and 0.02% for GXLC.