PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WLMIY vs. KCDMY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

WLMIY vs. KCDMY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wilmar International Ltd (WLMIY) and Kimberly-Clark de Mexico (KCDMY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WLMIY achieves a 31.28% return, which is significantly higher than KCDMY's 11.58% return. Over the past 10 years, WLMIY has outperformed KCDMY with an annualized return of 6.90%, while KCDMY has yielded a comparatively lower 6.15% annualized return.


WLMIY

1D
-0.72%
1M
8.66%
6M
18.16%
YTD
31.28%
1Y
40.11%
3Y*
6.28%
5Y*
3.28%
10Y*
6.90%
ALL TIME*
5.15%

KCDMY

1D
-0.34%
1M
5.54%
6M
7.37%
YTD
11.58%
1Y
31.08%
3Y*
7.37%
5Y*
14.43%
10Y*
6.15%
ALL TIME*
1.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$547.84K$545.69K$537.78K
$842.67K$1.11M$1.29M

WLMIY vs. KCDMY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WLMIY
Wilmar International Ltd
31.28%10.54%-9.22%-8.94%0.33%-8.74%22.12%31.74%4.90%-3.75%
KCDMY
Kimberly-Clark de Mexico
11.58%55.77%-28.48%40.30%15.89%-3.90%-9.84%29.96%-4.95%4.36%

Correlation

The correlation between WLMIY and KCDMY is 0.19, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2009

0.12

Fundamentals

Market Cap

WLMIY:

$19.08B

KCDMY:

$7.00B

Total Revenue (TTM)

WLMIY:

$69.34B

KCDMY:

MX$56.19B

Gross Profit (TTM)

WLMIY:

$5.37B

KCDMY:

MX$22.74B

EBITDA (TTM)

WLMIY:

$3.51B

KCDMY:

MX$15.13B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WLMIY vs. KCDMY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

WLMIY
WLMIY Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
WLMIY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WLMIY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
WLMIY Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
WLMIY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
WLMIY Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

KCDMY
KCDMY Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
KCDMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KCDMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
KCDMY Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
KCDMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
KCDMY Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

WLMIY vs. KCDMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wilmar International Ltd (WLMIY) and Kimberly-Clark de Mexico (KCDMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WLMIYKCDMYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.20

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.77

1.80

+0.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.40

4.83

+3.57

WLMIY vs. KCDMY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WLMIY Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is higher than the KCDMY Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WLMIY and KCDMY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WLMIY vs. KCDMY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WLMIY drawdown since its inception was -64.70%, smaller than the maximum KCDMY drawdown of -74.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WLMIY and KCDMY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WLMIYKCDMYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.70%

-74.61%

+9.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.54%

-17.34%

+2.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.72%

-39.82%

+20.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.96%

-39.82%

+7.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.02%

-42.87%

+0.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.92%

-27.32%

+19.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.04%

-46.30%

+13.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.79%

6.45%

-1.66%

Volatility

WLMIY vs. KCDMY - Volatility Comparison

Wilmar International Ltd (WLMIY) and Kimberly-Clark de Mexico (KCDMY) have volatilities of 4.72% and 4.52%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WLMIYKCDMYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.72%

4.52%

+0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.76%

19.62%

-0.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.99%

27.88%

-4.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.74%

32.22%

-4.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.74%

33.87%

-5.13%

Dividends

WLMIY vs. KCDMY - Dividend Comparison

WLMIY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%, less than KCDMY's 5.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KCDMY
Kimberly-Clark de Mexico
5.02%4.82%12.08%3.96%4.24%6.72%4.70%4.08%5.16%7.20%5.68%3.98%
WLMIY
Wilmar International Ltd
3.55%4.40%5.62%4.82%4.03%4.93%2.55%2.19%3.00%3.29%4.32%2.88%

Financials

WLMIY vs. KCDMY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Wilmar International Ltd and Kimberly-Clark de Mexico. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


WLMIY and KCDMY have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WLMIY has higher volatility (4.72%) compared to KCDMY (4.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WLMIY dropped -64.70% vs KCDMY's -74.61%.

WLMIY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WLMIY and KCDMY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer