PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WLIVX vs. FHLFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WLIVX vs. FHLFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WCM Focused International Value Fund (WLIVX) and Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WLIVX achieves a 13.65% return, which is significantly higher than FHLFX's 9.53% return.


WLIVX

1D
0.83%
1M
5.73%
YTD
13.65%
6M
16.67%
1Y
35.36%
3Y*
26.38%
5Y*
10.75%
10Y*

FHLFX

1D
0.42%
1M
4.09%
YTD
9.53%
6M
12.09%
1Y
22.51%
3Y*
17.18%
5Y*
8.85%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WLIVX vs. FHLFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
WLIVX
WCM Focused International Value Fund
13.65%40.75%12.13%18.08%-26.40%17.41%31.80%
FHLFX
Fidelity Series International Index Fund
9.53%31.96%3.67%18.16%-14.17%11.23%21.43%

Correlation

The correlation between WLIVX and FHLFX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2020

0.89

The correlation between WLIVX and FHLFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WLIVX vs. FHLFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WLIVX
WLIVX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
WLIVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WLIVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
WLIVX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
WLIVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
WLIVX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

FHLFX
FHLFX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
FHLFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHLFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHLFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
FHLFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHLFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WLIVX vs. FHLFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WCM Focused International Value Fund (WLIVX) and Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WLIVXFHLFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.27

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.12

1.91

+1.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.92

7.17

+4.75

WLIVX vs. FHLFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WLIVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is higher than the FHLFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WLIVX and FHLFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WLIVXFHLFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.07

1.47

+0.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.56

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

0.53

+0.36

Drawdowns

WLIVX vs. FHLFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WLIVX drawdown since its inception was -37.86%, which is greater than FHLFX's maximum drawdown of -33.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WLIVX and FHLFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WLIVXFHLFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.86%

-33.58%

-4.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.65%

-11.37%

-0.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.44%

-13.62%

-2.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.86%

-29.36%

-8.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.42%

+0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.52%

-6.11%

-4.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.03%

3.03%

0.00%

Volatility

WLIVX vs. FHLFX - Volatility Comparison

WCM Focused International Value Fund (WLIVX) has a higher volatility of 5.57% compared to Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX) at 4.64%. This indicates that WLIVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FHLFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WLIVXFHLFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.57%

4.64%

+0.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.59%

12.08%

+2.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.59%

14.83%

+2.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.47%

15.98%

+2.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.08%

17.64%

+0.44%

WLIVX vs. FHLFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WLIVX has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FHLFX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

WLIVX vs. FHLFX - Dividend Comparison

WLIVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%, less than FHLFX's 3.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FHLFX
Fidelity Series International Index Fund
3.16%3.46%2.98%2.86%2.60%2.47%1.92%1.95%0.62%
WLIVX
WCM Focused International Value Fund
1.94%2.20%1.31%0.65%0.32%0.03%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WLIVX and FHLFX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WLIVX has higher volatility (5.57%) compared to FHLFX (4.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WLIVX dropped -37.86% vs FHLFX's -33.58%.

WLIVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WLIVX and FHLFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer