PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WLFC vs. ELMD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

WLFC vs. ELMD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Willis Lease Finance Corporation (WLFC) and Electromed, Inc. (ELMD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with WLFC having a 40.13% return and ELMD slightly higher at 40.38%. Over the past 10 years, WLFC has underperformed ELMD with an annualized return of 22.48%, while ELMD has yielded a comparatively higher 25.08% annualized return.


WLFC

1D
-1.19%
1M
-8.27%
6M
3.25%
YTD
40.13%
1Y
37.25%
3Y*
69.65%
5Y*
36.01%
10Y*
22.48%
ALL TIME*
10.01%

ELMD

1D
-2.90%
1M
5.69%
6M
46.89%
YTD
40.38%
1Y
124.25%
3Y*
54.94%
5Y*
28.41%
10Y*
25.08%
ALL TIME*
15.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WLFC vs. ELMD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WLFC
Willis Lease Finance Corporation
40.13%-34.14%332.92%-17.17%56.73%23.60%-48.29%70.26%38.57%-2.38%
ELMD
Electromed, Inc.
40.38%-1.46%170.85%4.00%-19.31%32.52%13.41%69.94%-16.14%56.44%

Correlation

The correlation between WLFC and ELMD is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 13, 2010

0.10

Fundamentals

Market Cap

WLFC:

$4.53B

ELMD:

$338.49M

EPS

WLFC:

$16.95

ELMD:

$1.17

PE Ratio

WLFC:

11.17

ELMD:

35.09

PEG Ratio

WLFC:

0.00

ELMD:

0.96

PS Ratio

WLFC:

1.78

ELMD:

4.94

PB Ratio

WLFC:

1.98

ELMD:

7.19

Total Revenue (TTM)

WLFC:

$757.62M

ELMD:

$71.75M

Gross Profit (TTM)

WLFC:

$405.87M

ELMD:

$56.28M

EBITDA (TTM)

WLFC:

$416.98M

ELMD:

$14.10M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WLFC vs. ELMD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WLFC
WLFC Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
WLFC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WLFC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
WLFC Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
WLFC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
WLFC Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

ELMD
ELMD Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
ELMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ELMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
ELMD Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
ELMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
ELMD Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WLFC vs. ELMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Willis Lease Finance Corporation (WLFC) and Electromed, Inc. (ELMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WLFCELMDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.42

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.18

5.37

-4.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.31

12.05

-9.74

WLFC vs. ELMD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WLFC Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is lower than the ELMD Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WLFC and ELMD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WLFC vs. ELMD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WLFC drawdown since its inception was -88.12%, which is greater than ELMD's maximum drawdown of -78.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WLFC and ELMD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WLFCELMDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.12%

-78.65%

-9.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.84%

-23.27%

-8.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.88%

-48.86%

-1.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.88%

-48.86%

-1.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-79.76%

-55.84%

-23.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.07%

-11.73%

-9.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.25%

-33.68%

-8.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.19%

10.35%

+5.84%

Volatility

WLFC vs. ELMD - Volatility Comparison

Willis Lease Finance Corporation (WLFC) has a higher volatility of 15.51% compared to Electromed, Inc. (ELMD) at 12.54%. This indicates that WLFC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ELMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WLFCELMDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.51%

12.54%

+2.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.29%

37.77%

-0.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.44%

52.52%

-5.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.24%

46.45%

-3.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.05%

52.97%

-1.92%

Dividends

WLFC vs. ELMD - Dividend Comparison

WLFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, while ELMD has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
ELMD
Electromed, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%
WLFC
Willis Lease Finance Corporation
0.77%0.85%0.72%

Financials

WLFC vs. ELMD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Willis Lease Finance Corporation and Electromed, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
194.35M
18.58M
(WLFC) Total Revenue
(ELMD) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

WLFC vs. ELMD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Willis Lease Finance Corporation and Electromed, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober20260
78.8%
Portfolio components
WLFC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Willis Lease Finance Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 194.35M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

ELMD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Electromed, Inc. reported a gross profit of 14.64M and revenue of 18.58M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 78.8%.

WLFC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Willis Lease Finance Corporation reported an operating income of 33.79M and revenue of 194.35M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.4%.

ELMD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Electromed, Inc. reported an operating income of 3.77M and revenue of 18.58M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.3%.

WLFC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Willis Lease Finance Corporation reported a net income of 23.66M and revenue of 194.35M, resulting in a net margin of 12.2%.

ELMD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Electromed, Inc. reported a net income of 3.00M and revenue of 18.58M, resulting in a net margin of 16.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


WLFC and ELMD have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WLFC has higher volatility (15.51%) compared to ELMD (12.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WLFC dropped -88.12% vs ELMD's -78.65%.

ELMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WLFC and ELMD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer