PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WLFC vs. ASCCY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

WLFC vs. ASCCY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Willis Lease Finance Corporation (WLFC) and Asics Corp ADR (ASCCY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WLFC achieves a 40.80% return, which is significantly higher than ASCCY's 17.57% return.


WLFC

1D
-0.82%
1M
-10.11%
YTD
40.80%
6M
43.65%
1Y
31.69%
3Y*
66.56%
5Y*
33.79%
10Y*
23.34%

ASCCY

1D
-0.95%
1M
-4.58%
YTD
17.57%
6M
13.17%
1Y
15.77%
3Y*
54.90%
5Y*
36.39%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WLFC vs. ASCCY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WLFC
Willis Lease Finance Corporation
40.80%-34.14%332.92%-17.17%56.73%23.60%-48.29%70.26%38.57%0.85%
ASCCY
Asics Corp ADR
17.57%21.77%152.83%43.48%1.37%10.10%18.67%27.61%-13.67%-0.86%

Correlation

The correlation between WLFC and ASCCY is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2017

0.12

Over the past year, WLFC and ASCCY have become more correlated (0.33) than their long-term average of 0.12, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

WLFC:

$1.38B

ASCCY:

$19.93B

EPS

WLFC:

$17.02

ASCCY:

¥161.60

PE Ratio

WLFC:

11.18

ASCCY:

27.86

PEG Ratio

WLFC:

0.00

ASCCY:

0.33

PS Ratio

WLFC:

1.78

ASCCY:

3.63

PB Ratio

WLFC:

1.99

ASCCY:

10.05

Total Revenue (TTM)

WLFC:

$757.62M

ASCCY:

¥885.06B

Gross Profit (TTM)

WLFC:

$405.87M

ASCCY:

¥476.81B

EBITDA (TTM)

WLFC:

$416.98M

ASCCY:

¥190.22B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WLFC vs. ASCCY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WLFC
WLFC Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
WLFC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WLFC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
WLFC Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
WLFC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
WLFC Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

ASCCY
ASCCY Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
ASCCY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASCCY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASCCY Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
ASCCY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASCCY Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WLFC vs. ASCCY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Willis Lease Finance Corporation (WLFC) and Asics Corp ADR (ASCCY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WLFCASCCYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.10

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.00

0.76

+0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.00

1.42

+0.59

WLFC vs. ASCCY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WLFC Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is higher than the ASCCY Sharpe Ratio of 0.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WLFC and ASCCY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WLFC vs. ASCCY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WLFC drawdown since its inception was -88.12%, which is greater than ASCCY's maximum drawdown of -64.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WLFC and ASCCY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WLFCASCCYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.12%

-64.92%

-23.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.84%

-20.82%

-11.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.88%

-27.09%

-22.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.88%

-47.44%

-2.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-79.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.21%

-12.05%

-8.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.35%

-18.12%

-24.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.87%

11.17%

+4.70%

Volatility

WLFC vs. ASCCY - Volatility Comparison

Willis Lease Finance Corporation (WLFC) has a higher volatility of 16.30% compared to Asics Corp ADR (ASCCY) at 9.57%. This indicates that WLFC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASCCY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WLFCASCCYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.30%

9.57%

+6.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.76%

29.02%

+7.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.92%

41.05%

+5.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.82%

44.88%

-2.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.96%

47.06%

+3.90%

Dividends

WLFC vs. ASCCY - Dividend Comparison

WLFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, more than ASCCY's 0.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
ASCCY
Asics Corp ADR
0.29%0.34%0.69%
WLFC
Willis Lease Finance Corporation
0.76%0.85%0.72%

Financials

WLFC vs. ASCCY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Willis Lease Finance Corporation and Asics Corp ADR. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00B200.00B250.00B20222023202420252026
194.35M
275.23B
(WLFC) Total Revenue
(ASCCY) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. WLFC values in USD, ASCCY values in JPY

WLFC vs. ASCCY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Willis Lease Finance Corporation and Asics Corp ADR over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%202220232024202520260
51.8%
Portfolio components
WLFC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Willis Lease Finance Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 194.35M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

ASCCY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Asics Corp ADR reported a gross profit of 142.55B and revenue of 275.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.8%.

WLFC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Willis Lease Finance Corporation reported an operating income of 33.79M and revenue of 194.35M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.4%.

ASCCY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Asics Corp ADR reported an operating income of 61.88B and revenue of 275.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.5%.

WLFC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Willis Lease Finance Corporation reported a net income of 23.66M and revenue of 194.35M, resulting in a net margin of 12.2%.

ASCCY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Asics Corp ADR reported a net income of 47.43B and revenue of 275.23B, resulting in a net margin of 17.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


WLFC and ASCCY have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WLFC has higher volatility (16.30%) compared to ASCCY (9.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WLFC dropped -88.12% vs ASCCY's -64.92%.

WLFC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.68 vs 0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WLFC and ASCCY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer