WLDS.L vs. FSUS.L
WLDS.L (iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF) and FSUS.L (iShares Edge MSCI USA Multifactor UCITS) are both exchange-traded funds - WLDS.L is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Small Cap Inde, while FSUS.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD. Both are passively managed. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.
Performance
WLDS.L vs. FSUS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
WLDS.L is traded in GBP, while FSUS.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the FSUS.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
WLDS.L
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- 4.25%
- YTD
- 14.58%
- 6M
- 14.95%
- 1Y
- 33.75%
- 3Y*
- 15.03%
- 5Y*
- 8.23%
- 10Y*
- —
FSUS.L
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WLDS.L vs. FSUS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WLDS.L iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF | 14.58% | 11.86% | 8.58% | 11.22% | -8.89% | 16.71% | 12.54% | 20.41% | -4.07% |
FSUS.L iShares Edge MSCI USA Multifactor UCITS | 0.00% | 10.65% | 24.39% | 11.36% | -6.29% | 26.79% | 6.64% | 21.37% | -0.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between WLDS.L and FSUS.L is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2018 | 0.80 |
Over the past year, the correlation between WLDS.L and FSUS.L has dropped to 0.40 - well below their long-term average of 0.80, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
WLDS.L vs. FSUS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
WLDS.L
FSUS.L
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Industrials
WLDS.L
FSUS.L
Technology
WLDS.L
FSUS.L
Financial Services
WLDS.L
FSUS.L
Consumer Cyclical
WLDS.L
FSUS.L
Healthcare
WLDS.L
FSUS.L
Basic Materials
WLDS.L
FSUS.L
Real Estate
WLDS.L
FSUS.L
Energy
WLDS.L
FSUS.L
Consumer Defensive
WLDS.L
FSUS.L
Communication Services
WLDS.L
FSUS.L
Utilities
WLDS.L
FSUS.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WLDS.L vs. FSUS.L — Risk / Return Rank
WLDS.L
FSUS.L
WLDS.L vs. FSUS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF (WLDS.L) and iShares Edge MSCI USA Multifactor UCITS (FSUS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WLDS.L | FSUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.32 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.35 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WLDS.L | FSUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.67 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | — | — |
Drawdowns
WLDS.L vs. FSUS.L - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WLDS.L | FSUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.26% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.78% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.55% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.55% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.36% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.06% | — | — |
Volatility
WLDS.L vs. FSUS.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WLDS.L | FSUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.41% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.29% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.58% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.53% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.29% | — | — |
WLDS.L vs. FSUS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both WLDS.L and FSUS.L have an expense ratio of 0.35%.
Dividends
WLDS.L vs. FSUS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither WLDS.L nor FSUS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
WLDS.L and FSUS.L have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WLDS.L and FSUS.L have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.
WLDS.L is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while FSUS.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. WLDS.L tracks MSCI World Small Cap Inde, while FSUS.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD.
Find the right allocation for WLDS.L and FSUS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer