PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WLDS.L vs. FSUS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WLDS.L vs. FSUS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF (WLDS.L) and iShares Edge MSCI USA Multifactor UCITS (FSUS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

WLDS.L is traded in GBP, while FSUS.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the FSUS.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


WLDS.L

1D
0.69%
1M
4.25%
YTD
14.58%
6M
14.95%
1Y
33.75%
3Y*
15.03%
5Y*
8.23%
10Y*

FSUS.L

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WLDS.L vs. FSUS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
WLDS.L
iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF
14.58%11.86%8.58%11.22%-8.89%16.71%12.54%20.41%-4.07%
FSUS.L
iShares Edge MSCI USA Multifactor UCITS
0.00%10.65%24.39%11.36%-6.29%26.79%6.64%21.37%-0.50%

Correlation

The correlation between WLDS.L and FSUS.L is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2018

0.80

Over the past year, the correlation between WLDS.L and FSUS.L has dropped to 0.40 - well below their long-term average of 0.80, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

WLDS.L vs. FSUS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
WLDS.L
FSUS.L

Industrials

20.5%
5.1%

Technology

15.2%
38.7%

Financial Services

13.3%
11.8%

Consumer Cyclical

10.6%
10.7%

Healthcare

9.5%
8.9%

Basic Materials

8.2%
1.5%

Real Estate

8.0%
1.3%

Energy

5.0%
3.9%

Consumer Defensive

3.9%
4.4%

Communication Services

3.0%
11.9%

Utilities

2.8%
2.0%

Industrials

WLDS.L
20.5%
FSUS.L
5.1%

Technology

WLDS.L
15.2%
FSUS.L
38.7%

Financial Services

WLDS.L
13.3%
FSUS.L
11.8%

Consumer Cyclical

WLDS.L
10.6%
FSUS.L
10.7%

Healthcare

WLDS.L
9.5%
FSUS.L
8.9%

Basic Materials

WLDS.L
8.2%
FSUS.L
1.5%

Real Estate

WLDS.L
8.0%
FSUS.L
1.3%

Energy

WLDS.L
5.0%
FSUS.L
3.9%

Consumer Defensive

WLDS.L
3.9%
FSUS.L
4.4%

Communication Services

WLDS.L
3.0%
FSUS.L
11.9%

Utilities

WLDS.L
2.8%
FSUS.L
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WLDS.L vs. FSUS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WLDS.L
WLDS.L Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
WLDS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WLDS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
WLDS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
WLDS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
WLDS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

FSUS.L
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WLDS.L vs. FSUS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF (WLDS.L) and iShares Edge MSCI USA Multifactor UCITS (FSUS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WLDS.LFSUS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.35

WLDS.L vs. FSUS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WLDS.LFSUS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

Drawdowns

WLDS.L vs. FSUS.L - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WLDS.LFSUS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.06%

Volatility

WLDS.L vs. FSUS.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WLDS.LFSUS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.29%

WLDS.L vs. FSUS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both WLDS.L and FSUS.L have an expense ratio of 0.35%.


Dividends

WLDS.L vs. FSUS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither WLDS.L nor FSUS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


WLDS.L and FSUS.L have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WLDS.L and FSUS.L have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.

WLDS.L is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while FSUS.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. WLDS.L tracks MSCI World Small Cap Inde, while FSUS.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WLDS.L and FSUS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer