FSUS.L vs. JPLG.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Edge MSCI USA Multifactor UCITS (FSUS.L) and JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating (JPLG.L).
FSUS.L and JPLG.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FSUS.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 TR USD. It was launched on Sep 4, 2015. JPLG.L is a passively managed fund by JPMorgan that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on Jul 9, 2019. Both FSUS.L and JPLG.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FSUS.L or JPLG.L.
Performance
FSUS.L vs. JPLG.L - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSUS.L achieves a 23.82% return, which is significantly higher than JPLG.L's 15.18% return.
FSUS.L
23.82%
3.48%
12.20%
27.33%
11.88%
N/A
JPLG.L
15.18%
1.19%
6.04%
20.27%
9.78%
N/A
Key characteristics
| FSUS.L | JPLG.L | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.32 | 2.49 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.32 | 3.60 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.45 | 1.45 |
| Calmar Ratio | 4.09 | 5.52 |
| Martin Ratio | 15.77 | 16.14 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.73% | 1.27% |
| Daily Std Dev | 11.76% | 8.19% |
| Max Drawdown | -27.61% | -27.53% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.49% | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FSUS.L vs. JPLG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSUS.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than JPLG.L's 0.20% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between FSUS.L and JPLG.L is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FSUS.L vs. JPLG.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI USA Multifactor UCITS (FSUS.L) and JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating (JPLG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FSUS.L vs. JPLG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither FSUS.L nor JPLG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
FSUS.L vs. JPLG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSUS.L drawdown since its inception was -27.61%, roughly equal to the maximum JPLG.L drawdown of -27.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSUS.L and JPLG.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FSUS.L vs. JPLG.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Edge MSCI USA Multifactor UCITS (FSUS.L) has a higher volatility of 3.67% compared to JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating (JPLG.L) at 2.46%. This indicates that FSUS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPLG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.