FSUS.L vs. VOO
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Edge MSCI USA Multifactor UCITS (FSUS.L) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO).
FSUS.L and VOO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FSUS.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 TR USD. It was launched on Sep 4, 2015. VOO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Sep 7, 2010. Both FSUS.L and VOO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FSUS.L or VOO.
Performance
FSUS.L vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSUS.L achieves a 23.82% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 25.02% return.
FSUS.L
23.82%
3.48%
12.20%
27.33%
11.88%
N/A
VOO
25.02%
0.63%
11.74%
32.35%
15.50%
13.11%
Key characteristics
| FSUS.L | VOO | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.32 | 2.67 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.32 | 3.56 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.45 | 1.50 |
| Calmar Ratio | 4.09 | 3.85 |
| Martin Ratio | 15.77 | 17.51 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.73% | 1.86% |
| Daily Std Dev | 11.76% | 12.23% |
| Max Drawdown | -27.61% | -33.99% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.49% | -1.76% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FSUS.L vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSUS.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between FSUS.L and VOO is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FSUS.L vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI USA Multifactor UCITS (FSUS.L) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FSUS.L vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
FSUS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSUS.L iShares Edge MSCI USA Multifactor UCITS | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.25% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% | 1.85% | 1.84% |
Drawdowns
FSUS.L vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSUS.L drawdown since its inception was -27.61%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSUS.L and VOO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FSUS.L vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI USA Multifactor UCITS (FSUS.L) is 3.67%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 4.09%. This indicates that FSUS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.