FSUS.L vs. EMIM.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Edge MSCI USA Multifactor UCITS (FSUS.L) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (EMIM.L).
FSUS.L and EMIM.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FSUS.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 TR USD. It was launched on Sep 4, 2015. EMIM.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI EM NR USD. It was launched on May 30, 2014. Both FSUS.L and EMIM.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FSUS.L or EMIM.L.
Key characteristics
| FSUS.L | EMIM.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 13.22% | 4.97% |
| 1Y Return | 17.29% | 8.27% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 8.87% | -0.32% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 10.11% | 3.53% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.47 | 0.61 |
| Daily Std Dev | 11.80% | 12.50% |
| Max Drawdown | -27.61% | -31.70% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.76% | -9.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSUS.L and EMIM.L is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
FSUS.L vs. EMIM.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, FSUS.L achieves a 13.22% return, which is significantly higher than EMIM.L's 4.97% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FSUS.L vs. EMIM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSUS.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than EMIM.L's 0.18% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FSUS.L vs. EMIM.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI USA Multifactor UCITS (FSUS.L) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (EMIM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FSUS.L vs. EMIM.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither FSUS.L nor EMIM.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
FSUS.L vs. EMIM.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSUS.L drawdown since its inception was -27.61%, smaller than the maximum EMIM.L drawdown of -31.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSUS.L and EMIM.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FSUS.L vs. EMIM.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Edge MSCI USA Multifactor UCITS (FSUS.L) has a higher volatility of 4.72% compared to iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (EMIM.L) at 4.17%. This indicates that FSUS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMIM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.