WLDR vs. WBIF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

WLDR (Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF) and WBIF (WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF) are both Global Equities funds. WLDR is passively managed, while WBIF is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, WLDR returned 18.09%/yr vs 2.38%/yr for WBIF. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WLDR charges 0.67%/yr vs 1.25%/yr for WBIF.

Performance

WLDR vs. WBIF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF (WLDR) and WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF (WBIF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WLDR achieves a 29.55% return, which is significantly higher than WBIF's 11.61% return.

WLDR

• 1D: -1.18%
• 1M: 11.85%
• YTD: 29.55%
• 6M: 34.62%
• 1Y: 57.12%
• 3Y*: 32.72%
• 5Y*: 18.09%
• 10Y*: —

WBIF

• 1D: -0.97%
• 1M: 5.70%
• YTD: 11.61%
• 6M: 10.57%
• 1Y: 23.01%
• 3Y*: 8.85%
• 5Y*: 2.38%
• 10Y*: 5.52%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WLDR vs. WBIF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
WLDR Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF	29.55%	31.24%	22.74%	18.93%	-10.44%	26.77%	-1.93%	21.54%	-20.28%
WBIF WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF	11.61%	9.16%	3.43%	0.49%	-8.38%	16.56%	-2.71%	2.68%	-8.24%

Correlation

The correlation between WLDR and WBIF is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.61
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.70
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 18, 2018	0.64

The correlation between WLDR and WBIF shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.71 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

WLDR vs. WBIF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	WLDR	WBIF
Technology	29.9%	19.9%
Financial Services	13.4%	31.0%
Communication Services	10.9%	2.6%
Consumer Defensive	9.1%	3.1%
Healthcare	9.1%	3.4%
Industrials	8.6%	14.6%
Consumer Cyclical	6.2%	11.1%
Energy	4.7%	2.9%
Basic Materials	3.5%	1.0%
Utilities	2.7%	10.3%
Real Estate	1.9%	-

Return for Risk

WLDR vs. WBIF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WLDR

WLDR Risk / Return Rank: 94
WLDR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
WLDR Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
WLDR Omega Ratio Rank: 93
WLDR Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
WLDR Martin Ratio Rank: 94

WBIF

WBIF Risk / Return Rank: 62
WBIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
WBIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
WBIF Omega Ratio Rank: 55
WBIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
WBIF Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WLDR vs. WBIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF (WLDR) and WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF (WBIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WLDR	WBIF	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.83	1.88	+1.95
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	5.08	2.73	+2.35
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.65	1.34	+0.31
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.48	3.50	+2.98
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	26.24	12.53	+13.70
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WLDR vs. WBIF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WLDR Sharpe Ratio is 3.83, which is higher than the WBIF Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WLDR and WBIF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WLDR	WBIF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.83	1.88	+1.95
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.06	0.19	+0.87
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.45	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.60	0.30	+0.29

Drawdowns

WLDR vs. WBIF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WLDR drawdown since its inception was -44.69%, which is greater than WBIF's maximum drawdown of -20.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WLDR and WBIF.

Drawdown Indicators

	WLDR	WBIF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.69%	-20.29%	-24.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.86%	-6.60%	-2.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.30%	-17.16%	-3.14%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.77%	-20.29%	-3.48%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-20.29%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.46%	-0.97%	-0.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.63%	-7.74%	-0.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.18%	1.84%	+0.34%

Volatility

WLDR vs. WBIF - Volatility Comparison

Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF (WLDR) has a higher volatility of 5.63% compared to WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF (WBIF) at 4.13%. This indicates that WLDR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WBIF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WLDR	WBIF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.63%	4.13%	+1.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.11%	8.63%	+3.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.00%	12.31%	+2.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.22%	12.86%	+4.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.94%	12.34%	+8.60%

WLDR vs. WBIF - Expense Ratio Comparison

WLDR has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is lower than WBIF's 1.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

WLDR vs. WBIF - Dividend Comparison

WLDR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.05%, more than WBIF's 0.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
WBIF WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF	0.06%	0.14%	1.17%	0.82%	0.96%	2.59%	0.09%	1.04%	0.77%	0.75%	0.67%	0.86%
WLDR Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF	7.05%	9.01%	13.99%	2.28%	2.10%	7.55%	1.80%	2.48%	2.82%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WLDR and WBIF in my portfolio?

WLDR and WBIF have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WLDR or WBIF?

WLDR has higher volatility (5.63%) compared to WBIF (4.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WLDR dropped -44.69% vs WBIF's -20.29%.

Which ETF is better, WLDR or WBIF?

On 5-year performance, WLDR leads with 18.09% vs 2.38% for WBIF. On fees, WLDR is cheaper at 0.67% per year. On volatility, WBIF has been the lower-risk option at 4.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, WLDR or WBIF?

Over the 5-year period, WLDR has performed better with a 18.09% return vs 2.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, WLDR or WBIF?

WLDR is cheaper with a 0.67% expense ratio, compared with 1.25% for WBIF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WLDR or WBIF?

WLDR has the higher dividend yield at 7.05%, compared with 0.06% for WBIF.

What is the main difference between WLDR and WBIF?

They also come from different issuers: Regents Park Funds and WBI. Their fees differ too: 0.67% for WLDR and 1.25% for WBIF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WLDR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.83 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.