PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WLDR vs. IDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WLDR vs. IDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF (WLDR) and iShares International Select Dividend ETF (IDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WLDR achieves a 29.55% return, which is significantly higher than IDV's 12.32% return.


WLDR

1D
-1.18%
1M
11.85%
YTD
29.55%
6M
34.62%
1Y
57.12%
3Y*
32.72%
5Y*
18.09%
10Y*

IDV

1D
-1.09%
1M
0.90%
YTD
12.32%
6M
15.21%
1Y
36.98%
3Y*
25.10%
5Y*
11.95%
10Y*
10.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WLDR vs. IDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
WLDR
Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF
29.55%31.24%22.74%18.93%-10.44%26.77%-1.93%21.54%-20.28%
IDV
iShares International Select Dividend ETF
12.32%52.16%4.00%10.32%-6.40%12.00%-5.94%23.56%-13.74%

Correlation

The correlation between WLDR and IDV is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 18, 2018

0.66

The correlation between WLDR and IDV shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.70 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

WLDR vs. IDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
WLDR
IDV

Technology

29.9%
0.9%

Financial Services

13.4%
30.1%

Communication Services

10.9%
10.0%

Consumer Defensive

9.1%
7.2%

Healthcare

9.1%

-

Industrials

8.6%
6.7%

Consumer Cyclical

6.2%
9.6%

Energy

4.7%
15.6%

Basic Materials

3.5%
5.8%

Utilities

2.7%
11.8%

Real Estate

1.9%
2.4%

Technology

WLDR
29.9%
IDV
0.9%

Financial Services

WLDR
13.4%
IDV
30.1%

Communication Services

WLDR
10.9%
IDV
10.0%

Consumer Defensive

WLDR
9.1%
IDV
7.2%

Healthcare

WLDR
9.1%
IDV

-

Industrials

WLDR
8.6%
IDV
6.7%

Consumer Cyclical

WLDR
6.2%
IDV
9.6%

Energy

WLDR
4.7%
IDV
15.6%

Basic Materials

WLDR
3.5%
IDV
5.8%

Utilities

WLDR
2.7%
IDV
11.8%

Real Estate

WLDR
1.9%
IDV
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WLDR vs. IDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WLDR
WLDR Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
WLDR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WLDR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
WLDR Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
WLDR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
WLDR Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

IDV
IDV Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
IDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDV Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
IDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDV Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WLDR vs. IDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF (WLDR) and iShares International Select Dividend ETF (IDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WLDRIDVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.65

1.52

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.48

4.36

+2.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

26.24

16.67

+9.57

WLDR vs. IDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WLDR Sharpe Ratio is 3.83, which is higher than the IDV Sharpe Ratio of 2.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WLDR and IDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WLDRIDVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.83

2.90

+0.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.06

0.77

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.22

+0.38

Drawdowns

WLDR vs. IDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WLDR drawdown since its inception was -44.69%, smaller than the maximum IDV drawdown of -70.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WLDR and IDV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WLDRIDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.69%

-70.14%

+25.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.86%

-8.52%

-0.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.30%

-11.86%

-8.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.77%

-29.19%

+5.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.46%

-2.80%

+1.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.63%

-15.40%

+6.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.18%

2.22%

-0.04%

Volatility

WLDR vs. IDV - Volatility Comparison

Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF (WLDR) has a higher volatility of 5.63% compared to iShares International Select Dividend ETF (IDV) at 4.32%. This indicates that WLDR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WLDRIDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.63%

4.32%

+1.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.11%

10.60%

+1.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.00%

12.85%

+2.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.22%

15.54%

+1.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.94%

17.94%

+3.00%

WLDR vs. IDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

WLDR has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than IDV's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

WLDR vs. IDV - Dividend Comparison

WLDR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.05%, more than IDV's 4.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDV
iShares International Select Dividend ETF
4.45%4.94%6.46%6.51%7.33%5.78%5.47%5.15%5.93%4.52%4.69%5.08%
WLDR
Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF
7.05%9.01%13.99%2.28%2.10%7.55%1.80%2.48%2.82%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WLDR and IDV have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WLDR has higher volatility (5.63%) compared to IDV (4.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WLDR dropped -44.69% vs IDV's -70.14%.

On 5-year performance, WLDR leads with 18.09% vs 11.95% for IDV. On fees, IDV is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, IDV has been the lower-risk option at 4.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, WLDR has performed better with a 18.09% return vs 11.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IDV is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.67% for WLDR.

WLDR has the higher dividend yield at 7.05%, compared with 4.45% for IDV.

WLDR tracks Thomson Reuters StarMine Affinity World Leaders Index, while IDV tracks Dow Jones EPAC Select Dividend. They also come from different issuers: Regents Park Funds and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.67% for WLDR and 0.49% for IDV.

WLDR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.83 vs 2.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WLDR and IDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer