WLDN vs. CRDO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

WLDN (Willdan Group, Inc.) and CRDO (Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd) are both stocks. WLDN operates in Engineering & Construction (Industrials), while CRDO operates in Communication Equipment (Technology). Over the past 3 years, WLDN returned 74.83%/yr vs 138.76%/yr for CRDO. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

WLDN vs. CRDO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Willdan Group, Inc. (WLDN) and Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WLDN achieves a -5.56% return, which is significantly lower than CRDO's 51.16% return.

WLDN

• 1D: 0.99%
• 1M: 27.72%
• YTD: -5.56%
• 6M: -6.89%
• 1Y: 72.27%
• 3Y*: 74.83%
• 5Y*: 20.09%
• 10Y*: 25.60%

CRDO

• 1D: 1.35%
• 1M: 12.36%
• YTD: 51.16%
• 6M: 20.22%
• 1Y: 184.46%
• 3Y*: 138.76%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WLDN vs. CRDO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
WLDN Willdan Group, Inc.	-5.56%	172.14%	77.16%	20.45%	-44.55%
CRDO Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd	51.16%	114.09%	245.20%	46.28%	14.25%

Correlation

The correlation between WLDN and CRDO is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.27
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.23
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2022	0.25

Fundamentals

Market Cap WLDN : $1.51B CRDO : $41.91B
EPS WLDN : $3.71 CRDO : $2.50
PE Ratio WLDN : 26.38 CRDO : 87.15
PEG Ratio WLDN : 0.42 CRDO : 0.07
PS Ratio WLDN : 2.17 CRDO : 30.83
PB Ratio WLDN : 4.85 CRDO : 20.31
Total Revenue (TTM) WLDN : $684.28M CRDO : $1.34B
Gross Profit (TTM) WLDN : $261.18M CRDO : $908.35M
EBITDA (TTM) WLDN : $64.86M CRDO : $463.79M

Return for Risk

WLDN vs. CRDO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WLDN

WLDN Risk / Return Rank: 71
WLDN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
WLDN Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
WLDN Omega Ratio Rank: 75
WLDN Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
WLDN Martin Ratio Rank: 67

CRDO

CRDO Risk / Return Rank: 85
CRDO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
CRDO Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
CRDO Omega Ratio Rank: 80
CRDO Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
CRDO Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WLDN vs. CRDO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Willdan Group, Inc. (WLDN) and Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WLDN	CRDO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.12	2.19	-1.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.76	2.62	-0.86
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.31	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.44	3.46	-2.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.10	8.36	-5.26
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WLDN vs. CRDO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WLDN Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is lower than the CRDO Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WLDN and CRDO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WLDN	CRDO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.12	2.19	-1.08
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.36	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.47	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.19	1.19	-1.00

Drawdowns

WLDN vs. CRDO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WLDN drawdown since its inception was -89.19%, which is greater than CRDO's maximum drawdown of -62.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WLDN and CRDO.

Drawdown Indicators

	WLDN	CRDO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-89.19%	-62.04%	-27.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-50.41%	-53.59%	+3.18%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-50.41%	-61.05%	+10.64%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-72.59%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-78.71%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-27.45%	-7.85%	-19.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-42.37%	-19.48%	-22.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	23.40%	22.17%	+1.23%

Volatility

WLDN vs. CRDO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Willdan Group, Inc. (WLDN) is 19.58%, while Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO) has a volatility of 28.14%. This indicates that WLDN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRDO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WLDN	CRDO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.58%	28.14%	-8.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	50.99%	64.18%	-13.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	65.15%	84.82%	-19.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	55.92%	81.37%	-25.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	54.17%	81.37%	-27.20%

Dividends

WLDN vs. CRDO - Dividend Comparison

Neither WLDN nor CRDO has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

WLDN vs. CRDO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Willdan Group, Inc. and Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

WLDN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Willdan Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 63.16M and revenue of 155.11M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.7%.

CRDO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd reported a gross profit of 298.07M and revenue of 437.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.2%.

WLDN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Willdan Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 7.29M and revenue of 155.11M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.7%.

CRDO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd reported an operating income of 155.85M and revenue of 437.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 35.7%.

WLDN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Willdan Group, Inc. reported a net income of 8.53M and revenue of 155.11M, resulting in a net margin of 5.5%.

CRDO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd reported a net income of 169.10M and revenue of 437.00M, resulting in a net margin of 38.7%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WLDN and CRDO in my portfolio?

WLDN and CRDO have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WLDN or CRDO?

CRDO has higher volatility (28.14%) compared to WLDN (19.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WLDN dropped -89.19% vs CRDO's -62.04%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CRDO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.