PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WISGX vs. NESIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WISGX vs. NESIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Growth Fund (WISGX) and Needham Small Cap Growth Fund Institutional (NESIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WISGX achieves a 16.57% return, which is significantly lower than NESIX's 82.25% return.


WISGX

1D
0.48%
1M
3.44%
YTD
16.57%
6M
14.79%
1Y
30.18%
3Y*
16.71%
5Y*
4.91%
10Y*
14.17%

NESIX

1D
4.01%
1M
22.94%
YTD
82.25%
6M
79.70%
1Y
125.34%
3Y*
33.75%
5Y*
10.97%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WISGX vs. NESIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WISGX
Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Growth Fund
16.57%6.85%15.75%18.32%-32.48%11.79%57.84%28.67%3.03%25.25%
NESIX
Needham Small Cap Growth Fund Institutional
82.25%11.16%13.47%5.85%-29.71%11.36%73.06%55.28%-4.87%12.63%

Correlation

The correlation between WISGX and NESIX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017

0.83

The correlation between WISGX and NESIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WISGX vs. NESIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WISGX
WISGX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
WISGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WISGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
WISGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
WISGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
WISGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

NESIX
NESIX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
NESIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NESIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
NESIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
NESIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
NESIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WISGX vs. NESIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Growth Fund (WISGX) and Needham Small Cap Growth Fund Institutional (NESIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WISGXNESIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.58

4.41

-2.83

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.29

4.72

-2.43

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.61

-0.34

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.75

7.79

-5.04

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.21

32.30

-22.09

WISGX vs. NESIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WISGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is lower than the NESIX Sharpe Ratio of 4.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WISGX and NESIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WISGXNESIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.58

4.41

-2.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

0.38

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.75

-0.27

Drawdowns

WISGX vs. NESIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WISGX drawdown since its inception was -43.22%, smaller than the maximum NESIX drawdown of -49.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WISGX and NESIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WISGXNESIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.22%

-49.61%

+6.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.66%

-17.12%

+5.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.87%

-35.21%

+6.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.22%

-49.61%

+6.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.26%

0.00%

-0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.54%

-15.00%

+2.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.14%

4.12%

-0.98%

Volatility

WISGX vs. NESIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Growth Fund (WISGX) is 6.26%, while Needham Small Cap Growth Fund Institutional (NESIX) has a volatility of 8.71%. This indicates that WISGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NESIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WISGXNESIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.26%

8.71%

-2.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.88%

21.13%

-5.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.33%

30.27%

-9.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.50%

29.29%

-4.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.01%

26.44%

-2.43%

WISGX vs. NESIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WISGX has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is lower than NESIX's 1.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

WISGX vs. NESIX - Dividend Comparison

Neither WISGX nor NESIX has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NESIX
Needham Small Cap Growth Fund Institutional
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.93%23.92%13.26%8.25%21.96%8.89%0.00%0.00%
WISGX
Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%29.83%7.74%0.00%0.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


WISGX and NESIX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NESIX has higher volatility (8.71%) compared to WISGX (6.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WISGX dropped -43.22% vs NESIX's -49.61%.

NESIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.41 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WISGX and NESIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer