WISGX vs. NEAIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Growth Fund (WISGX) and Needham Aggressive Growth Fund Institutional Class (NEAIX).
WISGX is managed by Segall Bryant & Hamill. It was launched on Dec 20, 2013. NEAIX is an actively managed fund by Needham. It was launched on Dec 30, 2016.
Performance
WISGX vs. NEAIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
WISGX vs. NEAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WISGX Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Growth Fund | 1.94% | 6.85% | 15.75% | 18.32% | -32.48% | 11.79% | 57.84% | 28.67% | 3.03% | 25.25% |
NEAIX Needham Aggressive Growth Fund Institutional Class | 12.01% | 26.99% | 14.86% | 38.37% | -27.02% | 38.46% | 52.49% | 44.68% | -15.64% | 10.07% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WISGX achieves a 1.94% return, which is significantly lower than NEAIX's 12.01% return.
WISGX
- 1D
- 4.27%
- 1M
- -7.03%
- YTD
- 1.94%
- 6M
- 5.24%
- 1Y
- 22.43%
- 3Y*
- 11.46%
- 5Y*
- 1.46%
- 10Y*
- 13.10%
NEAIX
- 1D
- 4.32%
- 1M
- -7.73%
- YTD
- 12.01%
- 6M
- 14.41%
- 1Y
- 61.23%
- 3Y*
- 27.45%
- 5Y*
- 15.66%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
WISGX vs. NEAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WISGX has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is lower than NEAIX's 1.20% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
WISGX vs. NEAIX — Risk / Return Rank
WISGX
NEAIX
WISGX vs. NEAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Growth Fund (WISGX) and Needham Aggressive Growth Fund Institutional Class (NEAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WISGX | NEAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.94 | 2.17 | -1.23 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.44 | 2.74 | -1.29 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.38 | -0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.52 | 4.33 | -2.81 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.85 | 15.43 | -9.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WISGX | NEAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 | 2.17 | -1.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 | 0.65 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.75 | -0.31 |
Correlation
The correlation between WISGX and NEAIX is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
WISGX vs. NEAIX - Dividend Comparison
WISGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NEAIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WISGX Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 29.83% | 7.74% | 0.00% | 0.09% |
NEAIX Needham Aggressive Growth Fund Institutional Class | 1.80% | 2.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 6.84% | 3.80% | 10.42% | 16.35% | 5.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
WISGX vs. NEAIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WISGX drawdown since its inception was -43.22%, which is greater than NEAIX's maximum drawdown of -35.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WISGX and NEAIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| WISGX | NEAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.22% | -35.93% | -7.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.26% | -13.98% | -0.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.22% | -35.93% | -7.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.22% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.74% | -7.73% | -1.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.69% | -8.73% | -3.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.69% | 3.92% | -0.23% |
Volatility
WISGX vs. NEAIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Growth Fund (WISGX) is 9.23%, while Needham Aggressive Growth Fund Institutional Class (NEAIX) has a volatility of 11.64%. This indicates that WISGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NEAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| WISGX | NEAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.23% | 11.64% | -2.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.49% | 19.83% | -4.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.34% | 28.92% | -4.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.44% | 24.33% | +0.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.93% | 24.46% | -0.53% |