WIP vs. EWS
WIP (SPDR FTSE International Government Inflation-Protected Bond ETF) and EWS (iShares MSCI Singapore ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WIP is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the FTSE International Inflation-Linked Securities Select (USD), while EWS is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Singapore Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, WIP returned 1.51%/yr vs 7.57%/yr for EWS. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.
Performance
WIP vs. EWS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WIP achieves a 3.03% return, which is significantly lower than EWS's 4.29% return. Over the past 10 years, WIP has underperformed EWS with an annualized return of 1.51%, while EWS has yielded a comparatively higher 7.57% annualized return.
WIP
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- -1.95%
- YTD
- 3.03%
- 6M
- 4.34%
- 1Y
- 8.35%
- 3Y*
- 4.44%
- 5Y*
- -0.96%
- 10Y*
- 1.51%
EWS
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -0.69%
- YTD
- 4.29%
- 6M
- 6.98%
- 1Y
- 13.77%
- 3Y*
- 20.03%
- 5Y*
- 8.63%
- 10Y*
- 7.57%
WIP vs. EWS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WIP SPDR FTSE International Government Inflation-Protected Bond ETF | 3.03% | 15.18% | -8.71% | 8.84% | -15.54% | -4.15% | 8.37% | 8.62% | -5.97% | 12.73% |
EWS iShares MSCI Singapore ETF | 4.29% | 31.35% | 22.10% | 6.15% | -9.80% | 5.47% | -8.47% | 14.54% | -11.34% | 34.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between WIP and EWS is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2008 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WIP vs. EWS — Risk / Return Rank
WIP
EWS
WIP vs. EWS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR FTSE International Government Inflation-Protected Bond ETF (WIP) and iShares MSCI Singapore ETF (EWS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WIP | EWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.17 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.62 | 1.77 | -0.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.84 | 4.29 | +0.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WIP | EWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 | 0.91 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.08 | 0.50 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 | 0.42 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 0.14 | -0.03 |
Drawdowns
WIP vs. EWS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WIP drawdown since its inception was -29.60%, smaller than the maximum EWS drawdown of -75.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WIP and EWS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WIP | EWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.60% | -75.00% | +45.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.16% | -7.82% | +2.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.16% | -16.34% | +5.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.84% | -29.06% | +0.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.84% | -40.84% | +12.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.04% | -4.30% | -0.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.58% | -21.87% | +13.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.73% | 3.22% | -1.49% |
Volatility
WIP vs. EWS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR FTSE International Government Inflation-Protected Bond ETF (WIP) is 3.11%, while iShares MSCI Singapore ETF (EWS) has a volatility of 4.69%. This indicates that WIP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WIP | EWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.11% | 4.69% | -1.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.96% | 11.96% | -5.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.81% | 15.15% | -6.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.46% | 17.31% | -5.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.17% | 18.06% | -7.89% |
WIP vs. EWS - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both WIP and EWS have an expense ratio of 0.50%.
Dividends
WIP vs. EWS - Dividend Comparison
WIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.86%, more than EWS's 3.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWS iShares MSCI Singapore ETF | 3.93% | 4.10% | 4.28% | 6.50% | 2.56% | 6.00% | 2.68% | 4.70% | 4.21% | 3.46% | 3.96% | 4.20% |
WIP SPDR FTSE International Government Inflation-Protected Bond ETF | 5.86% | 5.51% | 6.06% | 6.54% | 11.15% | 4.63% | 1.59% | 2.49% | 4.05% | 1.91% | 1.27% | 1.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WIP and EWS have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EWS has higher volatility (4.69%) compared to WIP (3.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WIP dropped -29.60% vs EWS's -75.00%.
On 10-year performance, EWS leads with 7.57% vs 1.51% for WIP. Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. On volatility, WIP has been the lower-risk option at 3.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EWS has performed better with a 7.57% return vs 1.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
WIP and EWS have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.
WIP has the higher dividend yield at 5.86%, compared with 3.93% for EWS.
WIP is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while EWS is Asia Pacific Equities. WIP tracks FTSE International Inflation-Linked Securities Select (USD), while EWS tracks MSCI Singapore Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares.
WIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.95 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WIP and EWS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer