WIMA vs. ORO

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

WIMA (WisdomTree International Adaptive Moving Average Fund) and ORO (Arrow Valtoro ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. WIMA is passively managed, while ORO is actively managed. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WIMA charges 0.42%/yr vs 1.25%/yr for ORO.

Performance

WIMA vs. ORO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree International Adaptive Moving Average Fund (WIMA) and Arrow Valtoro ETF (ORO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

WIMA

• 1D: -1.78%
• 1M: -0.20%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ORO

• 1D: -2.52%
• 1M: -7.86%
• YTD: -0.13%
• 6M: -3.06%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WIMA vs. ORO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
WIMA WisdomTree International Adaptive Moving Average Fund	-0.59%
ORO Arrow Valtoro ETF	-12.05%

Correlation

The correlation between WIMA and ORO is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2026	0.48

Return for Risk

WIMA vs. ORO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree International Adaptive Moving Average Fund (WIMA) and Arrow Valtoro ETF (ORO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

WIMA vs. ORO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WIMA drawdown since its inception was -3.33%, smaller than the maximum ORO drawdown of -12.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WIMA and ORO.

Drawdown Indicators

	WIMA	ORO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.33%	-12.89%	+9.56%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.94%	-12.89%	+10.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.95%	-6.71%	+5.76%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	WIMA	ORO	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.79%	23.53%	-6.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.79%	23.53%	-6.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.79%	23.53%	-6.74%

WIMA vs. ORO - Expense Ratio Comparison

WIMA has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than ORO's 1.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

WIMA vs. ORO - Dividend Comparison

Neither WIMA nor ORO has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WIMA and ORO in my portfolio?

WIMA and ORO have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, WIMA or ORO?

On fees, WIMA is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, WIMA or ORO?

WIMA is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 1.25% for ORO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WIMA or ORO?

WIMA and ORO have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between WIMA and ORO?

They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Arrow Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for WIMA and 1.25% for ORO.