WHR vs. EWS
WHR (Whirlpool Corporation) is a stock, while EWS (iShares MSCI Singapore ETF) is Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Singapore 25/50 Index. Over the past 10 years, WHR returned -9.69%/yr vs 8.80%/yr for EWS. Their 0.34 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
WHR vs. EWS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WHR achieves a -35.53% return, which is significantly lower than EWS's 20.64% return. Over the past 10 years, WHR has underperformed EWS with an annualized return of -9.69%, while EWS has yielded a comparatively higher 8.80% annualized return.
WHR
- 1D
- 13.80%
- 1M
- 20.48%
- 6M
- -45.61%
- YTD
- -35.53%
- 1Y
- -42.76%
- 3Y*
- -27.29%
- 5Y*
- -23.28%
- 10Y*
- -9.69%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.18%
EWS
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 8.09%
- 6M
- 18.49%
- YTD
- 20.64%
- 1Y
- 26.14%
- 3Y*
- 24.44%
- 5Y*
- 11.88%
- 10Y*
- 8.80%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.27%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $39.45M | $36.85M | $30.63M | |
| $104.72M | $99.38M | $121.50M |
WHR vs. EWS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WHR Whirlpool Corporation | -35.53% | -33.03% | 0.60% | -9.09% | -37.16% | 33.26% | 26.52% | 42.83% | -34.50% | -4.89% |
EWS iShares MSCI Singapore ETF | 20.64% | 31.35% | 22.10% | 6.15% | -9.80% | 5.47% | -8.47% | 14.54% | -11.34% | 34.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between WHR and EWS is 0.27, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.35 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 1996 | 0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WHR vs. EWS — Risk / Return Rank
WHR
EWS
WHR vs. EWS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Whirlpool Corporation (WHR) and iShares MSCI Singapore ETF (EWS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WHR | EWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 1.30 | -0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.70 | 3.36 | -4.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.21 | 8.17 | -9.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WHR vs. EWS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WHR drawdown since its inception was -82.49%, which is greater than EWS's maximum drawdown of -75.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WHR and EWS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WHR | EWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.49% | -75.13% | -7.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -61.66% | -7.82% | -53.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -71.14% | -16.34% | -54.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -81.10% | -29.06% | -52.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -81.77% | -40.84% | -40.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -76.56% | 0.00% | -76.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.26% | -21.88% | -1.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 35.45% | 3.21% | +32.24% |
Volatility
WHR vs. EWS - Volatility Comparison
Whirlpool Corporation (WHR) has a higher volatility of 19.01% compared to iShares MSCI Singapore ETF (EWS) at 4.03%. This indicates that WHR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EWS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WHR | EWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.01% | 4.03% | +14.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.75% | 11.87% | +28.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.72% | 15.53% | +33.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.72% | 17.26% | +23.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.38% | 17.94% | +21.44% |
Dividends
WHR vs. EWS - Dividend Comparison
WHR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.43%, more than EWS's 3.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWS iShares MSCI Singapore ETF | 3.63% | 4.10% | 4.28% | 6.50% | 2.56% | 6.00% | 2.68% | 4.70% | 4.21% | 3.46% | 3.96% | 4.20% |
WHR Whirlpool Corporation | 8.43% | 7.35% | 6.11% | 5.75% | 4.95% | 2.32% | 2.69% | 3.22% | 4.26% | 2.55% | 2.15% | 2.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WHR and EWS have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WHR has higher volatility (19.01%) compared to EWS (4.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WHR dropped -82.49% vs EWS's -75.13%.
EWS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs -0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WHR and EWS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer