WHR vs. EWS
WHR (Whirlpool Corporation) is a stock, while EWS (iShares MSCI Singapore ETF) is Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Singapore Index. Over the past 10 years, WHR returned -10.54%/yr vs 8.18%/yr for EWS. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
WHR vs. EWS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WHR achieves a -45.72% return, which is significantly lower than EWS's 17.05% return. Over the past 10 years, WHR has underperformed EWS with an annualized return of -10.54%, while EWS has yielded a comparatively higher 8.18% annualized return.
WHR
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- -9.89%
- 6M
- -53.95%
- YTD
- -45.72%
- 1Y
- -62.39%
- 3Y*
- -33.22%
- 5Y*
- -25.95%
- 10Y*
- -10.54%
EWS
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- 10.46%
- 6M
- 13.90%
- YTD
- 17.05%
- 1Y
- 24.56%
- 3Y*
- 23.30%
- 5Y*
- 11.84%
- 10Y*
- 8.18%
WHR vs. EWS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WHR Whirlpool Corporation | -45.72% | -33.03% | 0.60% | -9.09% | -37.16% | 33.26% | 26.52% | 42.83% | -34.50% | -4.89% |
EWS iShares MSCI Singapore ETF | 17.05% | 31.35% | 22.10% | 6.15% | -9.80% | 5.47% | -8.47% | 14.54% | -11.34% | 34.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between WHR and EWS is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 1996 | 0.34 |
The correlation between WHR and EWS shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (1 year) to 0.36 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WHR vs. EWS — Risk / Return Rank
WHR
EWS
WHR vs. EWS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Whirlpool Corporation (WHR) and iShares MSCI Singapore ETF (EWS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WHR | EWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.74 | 1.29 | -0.55 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -1.00 | 3.16 | -4.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.79 | 7.61 | -9.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WHR vs. EWS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WHR drawdown since its inception was -82.49%, which is greater than EWS's maximum drawdown of -75.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WHR and EWS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WHR | EWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.49% | -75.13% | -7.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -62.85% | -7.82% | -55.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -72.52% | -16.34% | -56.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -80.83% | -29.06% | -51.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -81.52% | -40.84% | -40.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -80.26% | -0.03% | -80.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.19% | -21.92% | -1.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.66% | 3.23% | +34.43% |
Volatility
WHR vs. EWS - Volatility Comparison
Whirlpool Corporation (WHR) has a higher volatility of 15.87% compared to iShares MSCI Singapore ETF (EWS) at 3.12%. This indicates that WHR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EWS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WHR | EWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.87% | 3.12% | +12.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.14% | 11.90% | +26.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.33% | 15.41% | +32.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.06% | 17.26% | +22.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.02% | 17.93% | +21.09% |
Dividends
WHR vs. EWS - Dividend Comparison
WHR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.99%, more than EWS's 3.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWS iShares MSCI Singapore ETF | 3.74% | 4.10% | 4.28% | 6.50% | 2.56% | 6.00% | 2.68% | 4.70% | 4.21% | 3.46% | 3.96% | 4.20% |
WHR Whirlpool Corporation | 6.99% | 7.35% | 6.11% | 5.75% | 4.95% | 2.32% | 2.69% | 3.22% | 4.26% | 2.55% | 2.15% | 2.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WHR and EWS have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WHR has higher volatility (15.87%) compared to EWS (3.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WHR dropped -82.49% vs EWS's -75.13%.
EWS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs -1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WHR and EWS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer