PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WHGSX vs. BOSOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WHGSX vs. BOSOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Westwood Quality SmallCap Fund (WHGSX) and Boston Trust Small Cap Fund (BOSOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WHGSX achieves a 9.42% return, which is significantly higher than BOSOX's 6.63% return. Over the past 10 years, WHGSX has underperformed BOSOX with an annualized return of 8.75%, while BOSOX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.23% annualized return.


WHGSX

1D
1.01%
1M
-0.52%
YTD
9.42%
6M
7.28%
1Y
15.21%
3Y*
9.16%
5Y*
3.66%
10Y*
8.75%

BOSOX

1D
0.80%
1M
2.85%
YTD
6.63%
6M
4.71%
1Y
6.71%
3Y*
7.74%
5Y*
4.92%
10Y*
10.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WHGSX vs. BOSOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WHGSX
Westwood Quality SmallCap Fund
9.42%-0.12%4.75%17.16%-12.42%27.94%2.16%27.13%-14.25%12.38%
BOSOX
Boston Trust Small Cap Fund
6.63%-4.04%12.52%10.09%-9.05%28.10%8.27%38.35%-6.01%12.24%

Correlation

The correlation between WHGSX and BOSOX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2007

0.94

The correlation between WHGSX and BOSOX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WHGSX vs. BOSOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WHGSX
WHGSX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
WHGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WHGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
WHGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
WHGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
WHGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

BOSOX
BOSOX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
BOSOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOSOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOSOX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
BOSOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOSOX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WHGSX vs. BOSOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Westwood Quality SmallCap Fund (WHGSX) and Boston Trust Small Cap Fund (BOSOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WHGSXBOSOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.10

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.68

0.74

+0.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.49

2.22

+2.28

WHGSX vs. BOSOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WHGSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is higher than the BOSOX Sharpe Ratio of 0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WHGSX and BOSOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WHGSXBOSOXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.01

0.53

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

0.28

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

0.53

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.43

-0.14

Drawdowns

WHGSX vs. BOSOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WHGSX drawdown since its inception was -56.51%, which is greater than BOSOX's maximum drawdown of -51.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WHGSX and BOSOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WHGSXBOSOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.51%

-51.32%

-5.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.47%

-10.69%

+0.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.67%

-22.36%

-4.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.67%

-22.36%

-4.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.94%

-36.79%

-6.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.84%

-6.67%

+3.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.46%

-7.27%

-3.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.91%

3.57%

+0.34%

Volatility

WHGSX vs. BOSOX - Volatility Comparison

Westwood Quality SmallCap Fund (WHGSX) has a higher volatility of 4.95% compared to Boston Trust Small Cap Fund (BOSOX) at 3.90%. This indicates that WHGSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BOSOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WHGSXBOSOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.95%

3.90%

+1.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.98%

10.08%

+1.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.42%

15.10%

+2.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.14%

17.82%

+2.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.09%

19.56%

+2.53%

WHGSX vs. BOSOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WHGSX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is lower than BOSOX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

WHGSX vs. BOSOX - Dividend Comparison

WHGSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.58%, more than BOSOX's 4.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BOSOX
Boston Trust Small Cap Fund
4.14%4.41%6.52%0.78%5.09%8.93%2.56%12.46%16.19%9.13%3.14%18.92%
WHGSX
Westwood Quality SmallCap Fund
5.58%6.11%6.37%4.06%3.67%4.69%0.65%1.04%7.20%7.25%0.52%0.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, WHGSX and BOSOX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

WHGSX has higher volatility (4.95%) compared to BOSOX (3.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WHGSX dropped -56.51% vs BOSOX's -51.32%.

WHGSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs 0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WHGSX and BOSOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer