PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WHGSX vs. WHGHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WHGSX vs. WHGHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Westwood Quality SmallCap Fund (WHGSX) and Westwood High Income Fund (WHGHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WHGSX achieves a 14.29% return, which is significantly higher than WHGHX's 4.06% return. Over the past 10 years, WHGSX has outperformed WHGHX with an annualized return of 9.15%, while WHGHX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.14% annualized return.


WHGSX

1D
1.96%
1M
4.60%
YTD
14.29%
6M
11.67%
1Y
19.03%
3Y*
9.83%
5Y*
5.43%
10Y*
9.15%

WHGHX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.79%
YTD
4.06%
6M
4.17%
1Y
12.16%
3Y*
10.17%
5Y*
4.71%
10Y*
6.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WHGSX vs. WHGHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WHGSX
Westwood Quality SmallCap Fund
14.29%-0.12%4.75%17.16%-12.42%27.94%2.16%27.13%-14.25%12.38%
WHGHX
Westwood High Income Fund
4.06%9.60%9.73%11.53%-11.10%7.24%14.89%9.45%0.36%4.20%

Correlation

The correlation between WHGSX and WHGHX is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2011

0.52

The correlation between WHGSX and WHGHX shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (all time) to 0.68 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WHGSX vs. WHGHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WHGSX
WHGSX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
WHGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WHGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
WHGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
WHGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
WHGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

WHGHX
WHGHX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
WHGHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WHGHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
WHGHX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
WHGHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
WHGHX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WHGSX vs. WHGHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Westwood Quality SmallCap Fund (WHGSX) and Westwood High Income Fund (WHGHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WHGSXWHGHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.52

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.88

3.36

-1.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.00

15.74

-10.75

WHGSX vs. WHGHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WHGSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is lower than the WHGHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WHGSX and WHGHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WHGSX vs. WHGHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WHGSX drawdown since its inception was -56.51%, which is greater than WHGHX's maximum drawdown of -18.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WHGSX and WHGHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WHGSXWHGHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.51%

-18.11%

-38.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.47%

-3.65%

-6.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.67%

-6.76%

-19.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.67%

-15.88%

-10.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.94%

-18.11%

-24.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.57%

+0.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.44%

-1.91%

-8.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.93%

0.78%

+3.15%

Volatility

WHGSX vs. WHGHX - Volatility Comparison

Westwood Quality SmallCap Fund (WHGSX) has a higher volatility of 5.51% compared to Westwood High Income Fund (WHGHX) at 1.65%. This indicates that WHGSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WHGHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WHGSXWHGHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.51%

1.65%

+3.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.36%

3.81%

+8.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.68%

4.63%

+13.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.18%

6.31%

+13.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.12%

5.95%

+16.17%

WHGSX vs. WHGHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WHGSX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is higher than WHGHX's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

WHGSX vs. WHGHX - Dividend Comparison

WHGSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.35%, less than WHGHX's 5.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
WHGHX
Westwood High Income Fund
5.61%6.27%5.81%5.23%4.79%3.45%3.54%4.39%4.79%4.58%4.07%4.60%
WHGSX
Westwood Quality SmallCap Fund
5.35%6.11%6.37%4.06%3.67%4.69%0.65%1.04%7.20%7.25%0.52%0.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


WHGSX and WHGHX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WHGSX has higher volatility (5.51%) compared to WHGHX (1.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WHGSX dropped -56.51% vs WHGHX's -18.11%.

WHGHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WHGSX and WHGHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer