WHGSX vs. SSLCX
Compare and contrast key facts about Westwood Quality SmallCap Fund (WHGSX) and DWS Small Cap Core Fund (SSLCX).
WHGSX is managed by Westwood. It was launched on Apr 2, 2007. SSLCX is managed by DWS. It was launched on Jul 14, 2000.
Performance
WHGSX vs. SSLCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
WHGSX vs. SSLCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WHGSX Westwood Quality SmallCap Fund | 1.83% | -0.12% | 4.75% | 17.16% | -12.42% | 27.94% | 2.16% | 27.13% | -14.25% | 12.38% |
SSLCX DWS Small Cap Core Fund | 0.38% | 4.99% | 9.85% | 13.09% | -13.53% | 41.16% | 14.65% | 21.72% | -14.28% | 11.63% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WHGSX achieves a 1.83% return, which is significantly higher than SSLCX's 0.38% return. Over the past 10 years, WHGSX has underperformed SSLCX with an annualized return of 8.40%, while SSLCX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.91% annualized return.
WHGSX
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- -6.76%
- YTD
- 1.83%
- 6M
- -0.89%
- 1Y
- 8.97%
- 3Y*
- 6.67%
- 5Y*
- 3.65%
- 10Y*
- 8.40%
SSLCX
- 1D
- -1.07%
- 1M
- -3.24%
- YTD
- 0.38%
- 6M
- -2.12%
- 1Y
- 8.58%
- 3Y*
- 8.94%
- 5Y*
- 5.62%
- 10Y*
- 9.91%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
WHGSX vs. SSLCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WHGSX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is lower than SSLCX's 0.95% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
WHGSX vs. SSLCX — Risk / Return Rank
WHGSX
SSLCX
WHGSX vs. SSLCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Westwood Quality SmallCap Fund (WHGSX) and DWS Small Cap Core Fund (SSLCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WHGSX | SSLCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.46 | 0.50 | -0.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.78 | 0.81 | -0.03 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.11 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.63 | 0.62 | +0.01 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.96 | 2.03 | -0.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WHGSX | SSLCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 | 0.50 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 | 0.32 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 | 0.47 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.37 | -0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between WHGSX and SSLCX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
WHGSX vs. SSLCX - Dividend Comparison
WHGSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.00%, more than SSLCX's 1.20% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WHGSX Westwood Quality SmallCap Fund | 6.00% | 6.11% | 6.37% | 4.06% | 3.67% | 4.69% | 0.65% | 1.04% | 7.20% | 7.25% | 0.52% | 0.41% |
SSLCX DWS Small Cap Core Fund | 1.20% | 1.21% | 1.52% | 0.68% | 1.07% | 1.67% | 0.35% | 0.16% | 5.99% | 5.78% | 0.60% | 8.42% |
Drawdowns
WHGSX vs. SSLCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WHGSX drawdown since its inception was -56.51%, smaller than the maximum SSLCX drawdown of -63.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WHGSX and SSLCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| WHGSX | SSLCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.51% | -63.14% | +6.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.68% | -10.06% | -4.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.67% | -22.57% | -4.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.94% | -48.07% | +5.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.51% | -5.55% | -2.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.53% | -11.38% | +0.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.73% | 3.09% | +1.64% |
Volatility
WHGSX vs. SSLCX - Volatility Comparison
Westwood Quality SmallCap Fund (WHGSX) has a higher volatility of 5.18% compared to DWS Small Cap Core Fund (SSLCX) at 4.67%. This indicates that WHGSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSLCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| WHGSX | SSLCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.18% | 4.67% | +0.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.07% | 11.01% | +1.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.16% | 17.54% | +2.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.14% | 17.64% | +2.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.05% | 21.06% | +0.99% |