PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BOSOX vs. RWK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BOSOX vs. RWK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Boston Trust Small Cap Fund (BOSOX) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF (RWK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOSOX achieves a 10.25% return, which is significantly lower than RWK's 14.32% return. Over the past 10 years, BOSOX has underperformed RWK with an annualized return of 10.61%, while RWK has yielded a comparatively higher 13.16% annualized return.


BOSOX

1D
1.22%
1M
3.92%
YTD
10.25%
6M
7.09%
1Y
12.15%
3Y*
8.22%
5Y*
6.17%
10Y*
10.61%

RWK

1D
-0.04%
1M
3.93%
YTD
14.32%
6M
11.91%
1Y
28.00%
3Y*
17.62%
5Y*
11.68%
10Y*
13.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BOSOX vs. RWK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BOSOX
Boston Trust Small Cap Fund
10.25%-4.04%12.52%10.09%-9.05%28.10%8.27%38.35%-6.01%12.24%
RWK
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF
14.32%10.27%11.94%23.76%-8.19%34.31%11.06%28.20%-14.65%13.39%

Correlation

The correlation between BOSOX and RWK is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 22, 2008

0.89

The correlation between BOSOX and RWK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BOSOX vs. RWK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOSOX
BOSOX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
BOSOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOSOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOSOX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
BOSOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOSOX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

RWK
RWK Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
RWK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RWK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
RWK Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
RWK Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
RWK Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOSOX vs. RWK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Boston Trust Small Cap Fund (BOSOX) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF (RWK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BOSOXRWKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.29

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.11

2.53

-1.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.34

8.11

-4.76

BOSOX vs. RWK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOSOX Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is lower than the RWK Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOSOX and RWK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BOSOX vs. RWK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOSOX drawdown since its inception was -51.32%, smaller than the maximum RWK drawdown of -56.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOSOX and RWK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BOSOXRWKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.32%

-56.49%

+5.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.69%

-11.14%

+0.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.36%

-24.58%

+2.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.36%

-24.58%

+2.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.79%

-46.20%

+9.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.50%

-1.45%

-2.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.27%

-7.53%

+0.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.54%

3.46%

+0.08%

Volatility

BOSOX vs. RWK - Volatility Comparison

Boston Trust Small Cap Fund (BOSOX) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF (RWK) have volatilities of 4.20% and 4.32%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BOSOXRWKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.20%

4.32%

-0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.25%

12.11%

-1.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.20%

16.84%

-1.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.84%

21.09%

-3.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.57%

22.97%

-3.40%

BOSOX vs. RWK - Expense Ratio Comparison

BOSOX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than RWK's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

BOSOX vs. RWK - Dividend Comparison

BOSOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.00%, more than RWK's 1.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BOSOX
Boston Trust Small Cap Fund
4.00%4.41%6.52%0.78%5.09%8.93%2.56%12.46%16.19%9.13%3.14%18.92%
RWK
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF
1.36%1.25%1.11%1.05%1.18%0.85%0.96%1.09%1.22%0.99%1.30%0.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


BOSOX and RWK have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RWK has higher volatility (4.32%) compared to BOSOX (4.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOSOX dropped -51.32% vs RWK's -56.49%.

RWK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BOSOX and RWK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer