PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WHEA.AS vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WHEA.AS vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF (WHEA.AS) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

WHEA.AS is traded in EUR, while QQQ is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the QQQ values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WHEA.AS achieves a -4.62% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 22.86% return. Over the past 10 years, WHEA.AS has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 7.34%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 21.69% annualized return.


WHEA.AS

1D
0.75%
1M
1.30%
YTD
-4.62%
6M
-4.77%
1Y
7.11%
3Y*
1.83%
5Y*
4.85%
10Y*
7.34%

QQQ

1D
0.00%
1M
11.49%
YTD
22.86%
6M
20.42%
1Y
39.12%
3Y*
25.40%
5Y*
19.10%
10Y*
21.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WHEA.AS vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WHEA.AS
SPDR MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF
-4.62%2.03%7.60%0.67%-0.70%30.65%3.27%25.71%6.68%5.47%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
22.75%6.44%33.87%50.21%-28.40%36.95%36.37%42.10%4.56%16.36%

Correlation

The correlation between WHEA.AS and QQQ is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2009

0.40

Over the past year, the correlation between WHEA.AS and QQQ has dropped to 0.13 - well below their long-term average of 0.40, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WHEA.AS vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WHEA.AS
WHEA.AS Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
WHEA.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WHEA.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
WHEA.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
WHEA.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
WHEA.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WHEA.AS vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF (WHEA.AS) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WHEA.ASQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.42

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.68

3.57

-2.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.67

11.18

-9.51

WHEA.AS vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WHEA.AS Sharpe Ratio is 0.52, which is lower than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WHEA.AS and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WHEA.ASQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

2.43

-1.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.87

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.96

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.79

-0.12

Drawdowns

WHEA.AS vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WHEA.AS drawdown since its inception was -25.77%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -46.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WHEA.AS and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WHEA.ASQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.77%

-46.01%

+20.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.31%

-11.01%

+0.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.20%

-27.21%

+6.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.20%

-30.99%

+9.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.77%

-30.99%

+5.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.05%

0.00%

-11.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.79%

-7.79%

+2.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.23%

3.51%

+0.72%

Volatility

WHEA.AS vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF (WHEA.AS) has a higher volatility of 4.21% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 3.68%. This indicates that WHEA.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WHEA.ASQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.21%

3.68%

+0.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.33%

11.50%

-2.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.47%

16.19%

-2.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.34%

22.04%

-8.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.50%

22.60%

-8.10%

WHEA.AS vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

WHEA.AS has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

WHEA.AS vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

WHEA.AS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.38%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%
WHEA.AS
SPDR MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WHEA.AS and QQQ have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for WHEA.AS.

WHEA.AS is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. WHEA.AS tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for WHEA.AS and 0.18% for QQQ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WHEA.AS and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer