PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WHCS.AS vs. GRID
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WHCS.AS vs. GRID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD Inc (WHCS.AS) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WHCS.AS achieves a 0.99% return, which is significantly lower than GRID's 18.27% return.


WHCS.AS

1D
-0.28%
1M
5.78%
6M
0.22%
YTD
0.99%
1Y
17.68%
3Y*
4.00%
5Y*
3.43%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.02%

GRID

1D
1.73%
1M
-7.10%
6M
15.29%
YTD
18.27%
1Y
27.15%
3Y*
20.20%
5Y*
15.25%
10Y*
18.65%
ALL TIME*
12.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WHCS.AS vs. GRID - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
WHCS.AS
iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD Inc
0.99%15.91%-5.14%3.47%-3.45%20.74%13.03%11.31%
GRID
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund
18.27%29.65%15.18%21.57%-13.89%27.65%48.84%9.89%

Correlation

The correlation between WHCS.AS and GRID is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2019

0.33

Over the past year, the correlation between WHCS.AS and GRID has dropped to 0.10 - well below their long-term average of 0.33, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WHCS.AS vs. GRID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WHCS.AS
WHCS.AS Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
WHCS.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WHCS.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
WHCS.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
WHCS.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
WHCS.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

GRID
GRID Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
GRID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRID Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRID Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
GRID Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRID Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WHCS.AS vs. GRID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD Inc (WHCS.AS) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WHCS.ASGRIDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.22

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.64

2.33

-0.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.96

6.94

-2.98

WHCS.AS vs. GRID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WHCS.AS Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is comparable to the GRID Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WHCS.AS and GRID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WHCS.AS vs. GRID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WHCS.AS drawdown since its inception was -26.42%, smaller than the maximum GRID drawdown of -40.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WHCS.AS and GRID.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WHCS.ASGRIDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.42%

-40.56%

+14.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.63%

-11.73%

+1.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.89%

-20.62%

+0.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.89%

-29.64%

+9.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.05%

-9.48%

+6.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.41%

-8.41%

+3.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.41%

3.92%

+0.49%

Volatility

WHCS.AS vs. GRID - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD Inc (WHCS.AS) is 5.30%, while First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID) has a volatility of 8.72%. This indicates that WHCS.AS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GRID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WHCS.ASGRIDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.30%

8.72%

-3.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.53%

19.40%

-7.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.18%

22.11%

-6.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.79%

21.51%

-6.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.17%

22.72%

-6.55%

WHCS.AS vs. GRID - Expense Ratio Comparison

WHCS.AS has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than GRID's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

WHCS.AS vs. GRID - Dividend Comparison

WHCS.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, more than GRID's 0.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GRID
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund
0.79%1.01%1.06%1.23%1.26%0.63%0.68%1.26%1.28%1.07%1.07%1.23%
WHCS.AS
iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD Inc
1.28%1.05%1.04%1.15%1.08%1.08%1.20%0.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WHCS.AS and GRID have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GRID is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GRID is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for WHCS.AS.

WHCS.AS is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while GRID is Alternative Energy Equities. WHCS.AS tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD, while GRID tracks Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for WHCS.AS and 0.70% for GRID.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WHCS.AS and GRID

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer