WHCS.AS vs. HEAL.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD Inc (WHCS.AS) and iShares Healthcare Innovation UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (HEAL.L).
WHCS.AS and HEAL.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. WHCS.AS is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. It was launched on Oct 17, 2019. HEAL.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. It was launched on Sep 8, 2016. Both WHCS.AS and HEAL.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: WHCS.AS or HEAL.L.
Key characteristics
WHCS.AS | HEAL.L | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 2.84% | 5.17% |
1Y Return | 11.84% | 26.02% |
3Y Return (Ann) | 2.19% | -7.32% |
5Y Return (Ann) | 8.63% | 5.34% |
Sharpe Ratio | 0.99 | 1.43 |
Sortino Ratio | 1.43 | 2.17 |
Omega Ratio | 1.17 | 1.25 |
Calmar Ratio | 1.20 | 0.50 |
Martin Ratio | 3.19 | 6.47 |
Ulcer Index | 3.31% | 3.30% |
Daily Std Dev | 10.80% | 15.37% |
Max Drawdown | -26.37% | -46.43% |
Current Drawdown | -7.81% | -30.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between WHCS.AS and HEAL.L is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
WHCS.AS vs. HEAL.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, WHCS.AS achieves a 2.84% return, which is significantly lower than HEAL.L's 5.17% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
WHCS.AS vs. HEAL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
WHCS.AS has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than HEAL.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
WHCS.AS vs. HEAL.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD Inc (WHCS.AS) and iShares Healthcare Innovation UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (HEAL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
WHCS.AS vs. HEAL.L - Dividend Comparison
WHCS.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, while HEAL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD Inc | 0.99% | 1.15% | 1.08% | 1.08% | 1.20% | 0.10% |
iShares Healthcare Innovation UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
WHCS.AS vs. HEAL.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WHCS.AS drawdown since its inception was -26.37%, smaller than the maximum HEAL.L drawdown of -46.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WHCS.AS and HEAL.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
WHCS.AS vs. HEAL.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD Inc (WHCS.AS) is 3.12%, while iShares Healthcare Innovation UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (HEAL.L) has a volatility of 4.19%. This indicates that WHCS.AS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HEAL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.