WGROX vs. AQMNX

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

WGROX (Wasatch Core Growth Fund) and AQMNX (AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class N) are both mutual funds - WGROX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Wasatch, while AQMNX is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by AQR Funds. Over the past 10 years, WGROX returned 11.48%/yr vs 4.02%/yr for AQMNX. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WGROX charges 1.17%/yr vs 2.97%/yr for AQMNX.

Performance

WGROX vs. AQMNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wasatch Core Growth Fund (WGROX) and AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class N (AQMNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WGROX achieves a 5.13% return, which is significantly lower than AQMNX's 8.86% return. Over the past 10 years, WGROX has outperformed AQMNX with an annualized return of 11.48%, while AQMNX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.02% annualized return.

WGROX

• 1D: 2.12%
• 1M: 2.82%
• YTD: 5.13%
• 6M: 2.42%
• 1Y: 0.34%
• 3Y*: 8.89%
• 5Y*: 0.66%
• 10Y*: 11.48%

AQMNX

• 1D: -1.43%
• 1M: -2.73%
• YTD: 8.86%
• 6M: 9.33%
• 1Y: 21.36%
• 3Y*: 10.68%
• 5Y*: 12.25%
• 10Y*: 4.02%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WGROX vs. AQMNX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
WGROX Wasatch Core Growth Fund	5.13%	-10.37%	13.13%	33.43%	-30.86%	20.76%	36.73%	33.31%	-3.75%	24.29%
AQMNX AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class N	8.86%	14.38%	7.96%	1.79%	35.16%	-1.31%	-0.62%	1.57%	-9.12%	-1.19%

Correlation

The correlation between WGROX and AQMNX is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.04
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.05
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.16
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2010	0.01

The correlation between WGROX and AQMNX shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (5 years) to 0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

WGROX vs. AQMNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WGROX

WGROX Risk / Return Rank: 3
WGROX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
WGROX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
WGROX Omega Ratio Rank: 3
WGROX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
WGROX Martin Ratio Rank: 3

AQMNX

AQMNX Risk / Return Rank: 88
AQMNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
AQMNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
AQMNX Omega Ratio Rank: 78
AQMNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
AQMNX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WGROX vs. AQMNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wasatch Core Growth Fund (WGROX) and AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class N (AQMNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WGROX	AQMNX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.03	2.45	-2.48
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.10	3.31	-3.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	1.43	-0.42
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.04	5.41	-5.44
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.09	20.75	-20.83

WGROX vs. AQMNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WGROX Sharpe Ratio is -0.03, which is lower than the AQMNX Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WGROX and AQMNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WGROX vs. AQMNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WGROX drawdown since its inception was -61.61%, which is greater than AQMNX's maximum drawdown of -27.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WGROX and AQMNX.

Drawdown Indicators

	WGROX	AQMNX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.61%	-27.50%	-34.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.89%	-4.09%	-11.80%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.61%	-13.70%	-13.91%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.16%	-13.70%	-26.46%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.16%	-24.13%	-16.03%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.71%	-4.09%	-10.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.90%	-10.37%	+0.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.42%	1.06%	+5.36%

Volatility

WGROX vs. AQMNX - Volatility Comparison

Wasatch Core Growth Fund (WGROX) has a higher volatility of 5.92% compared to AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class N (AQMNX) at 3.30%. This indicates that WGROX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AQMNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WGROX	AQMNX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.92%	3.30%	+2.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.63%	7.07%	+7.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.57%	9.03%	+10.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.09%	11.55%	+11.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.34%	10.20%	+13.14%

WGROX vs. AQMNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WGROX has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is lower than AQMNX's 2.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

WGROX vs. AQMNX - Dividend Comparison

WGROX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.13%, more than AQMNX's 1.88% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AQMNX AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class N	1.88%	2.05%	3.61%	8.15%	12.59%	6.59%	4.17%	2.92%	0.00%	0.00%	0.02%	6.30%
WGROX Wasatch Core Growth Fund	8.13%	8.55%	9.22%	0.00%	0.71%	16.82%	7.21%	10.73%	10.14%	6.24%	0.15%	12.70%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WGROX and AQMNX in my portfolio?

WGROX and AQMNX have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WGROX or AQMNX?

WGROX has higher volatility (5.92%) compared to AQMNX (3.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WGROX dropped -61.61% vs AQMNX's -27.50%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AQMNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.