AQMNX vs. DBMF

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

AQMNX (AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class N) and DBMF (iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF) are both Systematic Trend funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, AQMNX returned 13.17%/yr vs 8.43%/yr for DBMF. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AQMNX charges 2.97%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for DBMF.

Performance

AQMNX vs. DBMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class N (AQMNX) and iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with AQMNX having a 10.44% return and DBMF slightly higher at 10.77%.

AQMNX

• 1D: -0.57%
• 1M: -1.51%
• YTD: 10.44%
• 6M: 11.03%
• 1Y: 24.13%
• 3Y*: 11.77%
• 5Y*: 13.17%
• 10Y*: 4.42%

DBMF

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: -0.42%
• YTD: 10.77%
• 6M: 10.08%
• 1Y: 27.61%
• 3Y*: 9.24%
• 5Y*: 8.43%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AQMNX vs. DBMF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
AQMNX AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class N	10.44%	14.38%	7.96%	1.79%	35.16%	-1.31%	-0.62%	-0.60%
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF	10.77%	13.85%	7.24%	-8.94%	21.61%	11.49%	1.80%	10.51%

Correlation

The correlation between AQMNX and DBMF is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.52
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.54
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.54
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2019	0.52

The correlation between AQMNX and DBMF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

AQMNX vs. DBMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AQMNX

AQMNX Risk / Return Rank: 89
AQMNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
AQMNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
AQMNX Omega Ratio Rank: 80
AQMNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
AQMNX Martin Ratio Rank: 97

DBMF

DBMF Risk / Return Rank: 78
DBMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
DBMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
DBMF Omega Ratio Rank: 82
DBMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
DBMF Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AQMNX vs. DBMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class N (AQMNX) and iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AQMNX	DBMF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.71	2.24	+0.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.68	2.94	+0.75
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.47	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.55	4.55	+3.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	23.40	16.25	+7.16

AQMNX vs. DBMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AQMNX Sharpe Ratio is 2.71, which is comparable to the DBMF Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AQMNX and DBMF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AQMNX vs. DBMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AQMNX drawdown since its inception was -27.50%, which is greater than DBMF's maximum drawdown of -20.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AQMNX and DBMF.

Drawdown Indicators

	AQMNX	DBMF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.50%	-20.39%	-7.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.15%	-6.10%	+2.95%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.70%	-15.60%	+1.90%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-13.70%	-20.39%	+6.69%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-24.13%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.70%	-1.46%	-1.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.37%	-6.55%	-3.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.01%	1.70%	-0.69%

Volatility

AQMNX vs. DBMF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class N (AQMNX) is 2.65%, while iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) has a volatility of 2.85%. This indicates that AQMNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AQMNX	DBMF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.65%	2.85%	-0.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.75%	10.05%	-3.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.78%	12.42%	-3.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.52%	12.52%	-1.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.33%	12.40%	-2.07%

AQMNX vs. DBMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

AQMNX has a 2.97% expense ratio, which is higher than DBMF's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

AQMNX vs. DBMF - Dividend Comparison

AQMNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%, less than DBMF's 5.17% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AQMNX AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class N	1.86%	2.05%	3.61%	8.15%	12.59%	6.59%	4.17%	2.92%	0.00%	0.00%	0.02%	6.30%
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF	5.17%	5.91%	5.75%	2.91%	7.72%	10.38%	0.86%	9.35%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AQMNX and DBMF in my portfolio?

AQMNX and DBMF have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AQMNX or DBMF?

DBMF has higher volatility (2.85%) compared to AQMNX (2.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AQMNX dropped -27.50% vs DBMF's -20.39%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AQMNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.