WGBFX vs. SFAAX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

WGBFX (Allspring Spectrum Moderate Growth Fund) and SFAAX (Allspring Index Asset Allocation Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds from Allspring Global Investments. Over the past 5 years, WGBFX returned 5.91%/yr vs 7.13%/yr for SFAAX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. WGBFX charges 1.49%/yr vs 1.08%/yr for SFAAX.

Performance

WGBFX vs. SFAAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring Spectrum Moderate Growth Fund (WGBFX) and Allspring Index Asset Allocation Fund (SFAAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WGBFX achieves a 9.76% return, which is significantly higher than SFAAX's 5.76% return.

WGBFX

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: 1.55%
• YTD: 9.76%
• 6M: 9.20%
• 1Y: 20.26%
• 3Y*: 13.17%
• 5Y*: 5.91%
• 10Y*: —

SFAAX

• 1D: -0.32%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 5.76%
• 6M: 5.04%
• 1Y: 16.07%
• 3Y*: 13.21%
• 5Y*: 7.13%
• 10Y*: 9.45%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WGBFX vs. SFAAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
WGBFX Allspring Spectrum Moderate Growth Fund	9.76%	13.79%	9.12%	12.05%	-16.38%	11.63%	14.87%	16.98%	-7.18%	13.21%
SFAAX Allspring Index Asset Allocation Fund	5.76%	11.39%	14.61%	16.64%	-17.03%	15.76%	16.21%	21.52%	-2.82%	12.25%

Correlation

The correlation between WGBFX and SFAAX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017	0.90

The correlation between WGBFX and SFAAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

WGBFX vs. SFAAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WGBFX

WGBFX Risk / Return Rank: 72
WGBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
WGBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
WGBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 67
WGBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
WGBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 75

SFAAX

SFAAX Risk / Return Rank: 57
SFAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
SFAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
SFAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 51
SFAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
SFAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WGBFX vs. SFAAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Spectrum Moderate Growth Fund (WGBFX) and Allspring Index Asset Allocation Fund (SFAAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WGBFX	SFAAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.23	1.97	+0.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.02	2.75	+0.27
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.36	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.19	2.97	+1.22
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.28	12.29	+0.99

WGBFX vs. SFAAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WGBFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is comparable to the SFAAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WGBFX and SFAAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WGBFX vs. SFAAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WGBFX drawdown since its inception was -21.06%, smaller than the maximum SFAAX drawdown of -47.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WGBFX and SFAAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	WGBFX	SFAAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.06%	-47.78%	+26.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.99%	-5.69%	+0.70%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.24%	-11.69%	+3.45%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.06%	-24.32%	+3.26%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-24.32%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.69%	-1.30%	+0.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.39%	-5.84%	+1.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.57%	1.37%	+0.20%

Volatility

WGBFX vs. SFAAX - Volatility Comparison

Allspring Spectrum Moderate Growth Fund (WGBFX) has a higher volatility of 4.14% compared to Allspring Index Asset Allocation Fund (SFAAX) at 3.31%. This indicates that WGBFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SFAAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WGBFX	SFAAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.14%	3.31%	+0.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.26%	6.66%	+0.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.41%	8.56%	+0.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.59%	11.43%	-1.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.55%	11.43%	-1.88%

WGBFX vs. SFAAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WGBFX has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than SFAAX's 1.08% expense ratio.

Dividends

WGBFX vs. SFAAX - Dividend Comparison

WGBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.16%, less than SFAAX's 11.97% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SFAAX Allspring Index Asset Allocation Fund	11.97%	12.65%	12.74%	7.46%	4.98%	5.92%	3.77%	3.60%	3.88%	1.27%	1.66%	6.34%
WGBFX Allspring Spectrum Moderate Growth Fund	7.16%	7.86%	2.83%	0.18%	6.52%	11.59%	10.08%	0.89%	13.80%	12.07%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WGBFX and SFAAX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, WGBFX and SFAAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, WGBFX or SFAAX?

WGBFX has higher volatility (4.14%) compared to SFAAX (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WGBFX dropped -21.06% vs SFAAX's -47.78%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WGBFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.