PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WGBFX vs. WFMIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WGBFX vs. WFMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring Spectrum Moderate Growth Fund (WGBFX) and Allspring Special Mid Cap Value Fund Class I (WFMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WGBFX achieves a 6.48% return, which is significantly lower than WFMIX's 13.27% return.


WGBFX

1D
1.31%
1M
-1.69%
6M
3.10%
YTD
6.48%
1Y
14.88%
3Y*
10.87%
5Y*
4.98%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.24%

WFMIX

1D
0.02%
1M
0.17%
6M
7.16%
YTD
13.27%
1Y
17.44%
3Y*
10.75%
5Y*
8.74%
10Y*
10.80%
ALL TIME*
9.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

WGBFX vs. WFMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WGBFX
Allspring Spectrum Moderate Growth Fund
6.48%13.79%9.12%12.05%-16.38%11.63%14.87%16.98%-7.18%13.21%
WFMIX
Allspring Special Mid Cap Value Fund Class I
13.27%6.14%11.95%9.54%-4.65%28.53%3.27%40.27%-13.12%11.16%

Correlation

The correlation between WGBFX and WFMIX is 0.63, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.77

The correlation between WGBFX and WFMIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WGBFX vs. WFMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

WGBFX
WGBFX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
WGBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WGBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
WGBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
WGBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
WGBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

WFMIX
WFMIX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
WFMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WFMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
WFMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
WFMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
WFMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

WGBFX vs. WFMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Spectrum Moderate Growth Fund (WGBFX) and Allspring Special Mid Cap Value Fund Class I (WFMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WGBFXWFMIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.19

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.72

1.58

+1.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.43

5.26

+2.17

WGBFX vs. WFMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WGBFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is comparable to the WFMIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WGBFX and WFMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WGBFX vs. WFMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WGBFX drawdown since its inception was -21.06%, smaller than the maximum WFMIX drawdown of -52.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WGBFX and WFMIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WGBFXWFMIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.06%

-52.70%

+31.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.99%

-9.66%

+4.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.24%

-18.30%

+10.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.06%

-22.13%

+1.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.66%

-1.19%

-2.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.37%

-7.44%

+3.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.82%

2.91%

-1.09%

Volatility

WGBFX vs. WFMIX - Volatility Comparison

Allspring Spectrum Moderate Growth Fund (WGBFX) and Allspring Special Mid Cap Value Fund Class I (WFMIX) have volatilities of 3.35% and 3.21%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WGBFXWFMIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.35%

3.21%

+0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.95%

10.57%

-2.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.05%

14.10%

-4.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.71%

17.11%

-7.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.59%

18.85%

-9.26%

WGBFX vs. WFMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WGBFX has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than WFMIX's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

WGBFX vs. WFMIX - Dividend Comparison

WGBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.38%, less than WFMIX's 9.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
WFMIX
Allspring Special Mid Cap Value Fund Class I
9.93%11.24%8.00%5.51%8.71%9.87%0.66%7.48%2.74%4.41%1.44%4.47%
WGBFX
Allspring Spectrum Moderate Growth Fund
7.38%7.86%2.83%0.18%6.52%11.59%10.08%0.89%13.80%12.07%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WGBFX and WFMIX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WGBFX has higher volatility (3.35%) compared to WFMIX (3.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WGBFX dropped -21.06% vs WFMIX's -52.70%.

WGBFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WGBFX and WFMIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer