PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WGBFX vs. SCLAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WGBFX vs. SCLAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring Spectrum Moderate Growth Fund (WGBFX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Capital Stability Fund (SCLAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WGBFX achieves a 6.48% return, which is significantly higher than SCLAX's 2.26% return.


WGBFX

1D
1.31%
1M
-1.69%
6M
3.10%
YTD
6.48%
1Y
14.88%
3Y*
10.87%
5Y*
4.98%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.24%

SCLAX

1D
0.29%
1M
-0.19%
6M
1.46%
YTD
2.26%
1Y
5.43%
3Y*
5.49%
5Y*
3.28%
10Y*
3.16%
ALL TIME*
2.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

WGBFX vs. SCLAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WGBFX
Allspring Spectrum Moderate Growth Fund
6.48%13.79%9.12%12.05%-16.38%11.63%14.87%16.98%-7.18%13.21%
SCLAX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Capital Stability Fund
2.26%6.49%4.92%6.96%-3.74%1.72%3.30%7.91%-0.67%3.88%

Correlation

The correlation between WGBFX and SCLAX is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.81

The correlation between WGBFX and SCLAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WGBFX vs. SCLAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

WGBFX
WGBFX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
WGBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WGBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
WGBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
WGBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
WGBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

SCLAX
SCLAX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
SCLAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCLAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCLAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
SCLAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCLAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

WGBFX vs. SCLAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Spectrum Moderate Growth Fund (WGBFX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Capital Stability Fund (SCLAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WGBFXSCLAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.36

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.72

2.31

+0.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.43

8.90

-1.46

WGBFX vs. SCLAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WGBFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is comparable to the SCLAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WGBFX and SCLAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WGBFX vs. SCLAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WGBFX drawdown since its inception was -21.06%, which is greater than SCLAX's maximum drawdown of -5.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WGBFX and SCLAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WGBFXSCLAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.06%

-5.59%

-15.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.99%

-2.32%

-2.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.24%

-3.41%

-4.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.06%

-5.59%

-15.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-5.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.66%

-0.48%

-3.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.37%

-1.14%

-3.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.82%

0.60%

+1.22%

Volatility

WGBFX vs. SCLAX - Volatility Comparison

Allspring Spectrum Moderate Growth Fund (WGBFX) has a higher volatility of 3.35% compared to SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Capital Stability Fund (SCLAX) at 0.78%. This indicates that WGBFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCLAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WGBFXSCLAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.35%

0.78%

+2.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.95%

2.33%

+5.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.05%

2.91%

+7.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.71%

3.12%

+6.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.59%

2.77%

+6.82%

WGBFX vs. SCLAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WGBFX has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than SCLAX's 0.62% expense ratio.


Dividends

WGBFX vs. SCLAX - Dividend Comparison

WGBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.38%, more than SCLAX's 1.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCLAX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Capital Stability Fund
1.84%1.88%7.87%4.06%1.90%2.79%1.01%4.67%0.54%3.77%0.69%1.18%
WGBFX
Allspring Spectrum Moderate Growth Fund
7.38%7.86%2.83%0.18%6.52%11.59%10.08%0.89%13.80%12.07%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WGBFX and SCLAX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WGBFX has higher volatility (3.35%) compared to SCLAX (0.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WGBFX dropped -21.06% vs SCLAX's -5.59%.

SCLAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WGBFX and SCLAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer