WGBFX vs. FIQDX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

WGBFX (Allspring Spectrum Moderate Growth Fund) and FIQDX (Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class Z) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 5 years, WGBFX returned 4.98%/yr vs 5.62%/yr for FIQDX. Their 0.64 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. WGBFX charges 1.49%/yr vs 0.61%/yr for FIQDX.

Performance

WGBFX vs. FIQDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring Spectrum Moderate Growth Fund (WGBFX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class Z (FIQDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WGBFX achieves a 6.48% return, which is significantly lower than FIQDX's 7.02% return.

WGBFX

• 1D: 1.31%
• 1M: -1.69%
• 6M: 3.10%
• YTD: 6.48%
• 1Y: 14.88%
• 3Y*: 10.87%
• 5Y*: 4.98%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 7.24%

FIQDX

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 0.64%
• 6M: 3.39%
• YTD: 7.02%
• 1Y: 13.24%
• 3Y*: 8.25%
• 5Y*: 5.62%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 6.25%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FIQDX Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class Z	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
WGBFX Allspring Spectrum Moderate Growth Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

WGBFX vs. FIQDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
WGBFX Allspring Spectrum Moderate Growth Fund	6.48%	13.79%	9.12%	12.05%	-16.38%	11.63%	14.87%	16.98%	-8.94%
FIQDX Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class Z	7.02%	10.40%	6.03%	4.55%	-3.17%	15.96%	3.79%	10.63%	-4.90%

Correlation

The correlation between WGBFX and FIQDX is 0.44, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.44
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.57
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2018	0.64

The correlation between WGBFX and FIQDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.64 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

WGBFX vs. FIQDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

WGBFX

WGBFX Risk / Return Rank: 53
WGBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
WGBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
WGBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 43
WGBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
WGBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 53

FIQDX

FIQDX Risk / Return Rank: 91
FIQDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
FIQDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
FIQDX Omega Ratio Rank: 91
FIQDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
FIQDX Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

WGBFX vs. FIQDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Spectrum Moderate Growth Fund (WGBFX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class Z (FIQDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WGBFX	FIQDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.35	2.61	-1.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.87	3.55	-1.68
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.51	-0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.72	3.52	-0.81
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.43	11.39	-3.96

WGBFX vs. FIQDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WGBFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is lower than the FIQDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WGBFX and FIQDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WGBFX vs. FIQDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WGBFX drawdown since its inception was -21.06%, which is greater than FIQDX's maximum drawdown of -19.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WGBFX and FIQDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	WGBFX	FIQDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.06%	-19.98%	-1.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.99%	-3.63%	-1.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.24%	-5.91%	-2.33%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.06%	-12.79%	-8.27%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.66%	-2.38%	-1.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.37%	-2.96%	-1.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.82%	1.12%	+0.70%

Volatility

WGBFX vs. FIQDX - Volatility Comparison

Allspring Spectrum Moderate Growth Fund (WGBFX) has a higher volatility of 3.35% compared to Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class Z (FIQDX) at 1.71%. This indicates that WGBFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIQDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WGBFX	FIQDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.35%	1.71%	+1.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.95%	3.82%	+4.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.05%	4.96%	+5.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.71%	6.91%	+2.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.59%	7.38%	+2.21%

WGBFX vs. FIQDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WGBFX has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than FIQDX's 0.61% expense ratio.

Dividends

WGBFX vs. FIQDX - Dividend Comparison

WGBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.38%, more than FIQDX's 3.26% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FIQDX Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class Z	3.26%	4.75%	4.88%	5.38%	7.39%	5.44%	2.29%	3.17%	8.46%	0.00%
WGBFX Allspring Spectrum Moderate Growth Fund	7.38%	7.86%	2.83%	0.18%	6.52%	11.59%	10.08%	0.89%	13.80%	12.07%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WGBFX and FIQDX in my portfolio?

WGBFX and FIQDX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WGBFX or FIQDX?

WGBFX has higher volatility (3.35%) compared to FIQDX (1.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WGBFX dropped -21.06% vs FIQDX's -19.98%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FIQDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.