WFPRX vs. FASOX
WFPRX (Allspring Special Mid Cap Value Fund Class R6) and FASOX (Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class I) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, WFPRX returned 10.90%/yr vs 11.41%/yr for FASOX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. WFPRX charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for FASOX.
Performance
WFPRX vs. FASOX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WFPRX achieves a 10.59% return, which is significantly lower than FASOX's 24.07% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with WFPRX having a 10.90% annualized return and FASOX not far ahead at 11.41%.
WFPRX
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- 2.23%
- YTD
- 10.59%
- 6M
- 9.11%
- 1Y
- 18.00%
- 3Y*
- 11.58%
- 5Y*
- 9.00%
- 10Y*
- 10.90%
FASOX
- 1D
- 1.24%
- 1M
- 4.44%
- YTD
- 24.07%
- 6M
- 22.37%
- 1Y
- 41.69%
- 3Y*
- 14.40%
- 5Y*
- 10.21%
- 10Y*
- 11.41%
WFPRX vs. FASOX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WFPRX Allspring Special Mid Cap Value Fund Class R6 | 10.59% | 6.25% | 12.05% | 9.65% | -4.57% | 28.69% | 3.36% | 40.42% | -13.04% | 11.27% |
FASOX Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class I | 24.07% | 8.28% | -2.00% | 20.51% | -7.38% | 33.31% | 8.21% | 34.49% | -16.90% | 17.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between WFPRX and FASOX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2013 | 0.93 |
The correlation between WFPRX and FASOX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WFPRX vs. FASOX — Risk / Return Rank
WFPRX
FASOX
WFPRX vs. FASOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Special Mid Cap Value Fund Class R6 (WFPRX) and Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class I (FASOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WFPRX | FASOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.41 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.91 | 4.36 | -2.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.29 | 16.03 | -9.74 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WFPRX vs. FASOX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WFPRX drawdown since its inception was -43.78%, smaller than the maximum FASOX drawdown of -69.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WFPRX and FASOX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WFPRX | FASOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.78% | -69.86% | +26.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.66% | -9.79% | +0.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.27% | -34.34% | +16.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.07% | -34.34% | +12.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.78% | -47.97% | +4.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.08% | -0.47% | -0.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.07% | -9.69% | +4.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.92% | 2.65% | +0.27% |
Volatility
WFPRX vs. FASOX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Allspring Special Mid Cap Value Fund Class R6 (WFPRX) is 4.20%, while Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class I (FASOX) has a volatility of 5.20%. This indicates that WFPRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FASOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WFPRX | FASOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.20% | 5.20% | -1.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.72% | 12.30% | -1.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.20% | 17.32% | -3.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.20% | 20.70% | -3.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.91% | 22.03% | -3.12% |
WFPRX vs. FASOX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WFPRX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than FASOX's 0.88% expense ratio.
Dividends
WFPRX vs. FASOX - Dividend Comparison
WFPRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.24%, more than FASOX's 7.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FASOX Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class I | 7.28% | 9.03% | 0.00% | 2.74% | 2.34% | 7.97% | 0.91% | 5.21% | 15.65% | 7.00% | 20.89% | 1.24% |
WFPRX Allspring Special Mid Cap Value Fund Class R6 | 10.24% | 11.32% | 8.09% | 5.60% | 8.81% | 9.95% | 0.75% | 7.56% | 2.85% | 4.49% | 1.50% | 4.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, WFPRX and FASOX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FASOX has higher volatility (5.20%) compared to WFPRX (4.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WFPRX dropped -43.78% vs FASOX's -69.86%.
FASOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WFPRX and FASOX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer