WFIG vs. QGRW
WFIG (WisdomTree U.S. Corporate Bond Fund) and QGRW (WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - WFIG is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the WisdomTree Fundamental Corporate Bond Index, while QGRW is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, WFIG returned 5.20%/yr vs 27.10%/yr for QGRW. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WFIG charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for QGRW.
Performance
WFIG vs. QGRW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WFIG achieves a 0.19% return, which is significantly lower than QGRW's 10.31% return.
WFIG
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- -0.38%
- YTD
- 0.19%
- 6M
- 0.35%
- 1Y
- 5.27%
- 3Y*
- 5.20%
- 5Y*
- 0.50%
- 10Y*
- 2.47%
QGRW
- 1D
- -4.43%
- 1M
- 1.01%
- YTD
- 10.31%
- 6M
- 8.85%
- 1Y
- 29.86%
- 3Y*
- 27.10%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WFIG vs. QGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WFIG WisdomTree U.S. Corporate Bond Fund | 0.19% | 7.85% | 2.28% | 8.48% | -3.05% |
QGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund | 10.31% | 19.20% | 34.85% | 56.05% | -3.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between WFIG and QGRW is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2022 | 0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WFIG vs. QGRW — Risk / Return Rank
WFIG
QGRW
WFIG vs. QGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Corporate Bond Fund (WFIG) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WFIG | QGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.30 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.97 | 1.94 | +0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.12 | 7.57 | -1.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WFIG | QGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.28 | 1.67 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 1.56 | -1.24 |
Drawdowns
WFIG vs. QGRW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WFIG drawdown since its inception was -22.92%, smaller than the maximum QGRW drawdown of -24.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WFIG and QGRW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WFIG | QGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.92% | -24.40% | +1.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.69% | -15.44% | +12.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.22% | -24.40% | +18.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.92% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.92% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.60% | -5.70% | +4.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.51% | -3.26% | -2.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.86% | 3.95% | -3.09% |
Volatility
WFIG vs. QGRW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree U.S. Corporate Bond Fund (WFIG) is 1.34%, while WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW) has a volatility of 6.44%. This indicates that WFIG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QGRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WFIG | QGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.34% | 6.44% | -5.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.08% | 14.44% | -11.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.15% | 17.97% | -13.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.13% | 21.20% | -14.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.54% | 21.20% | -13.66% |
WFIG vs. QGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison
WFIG has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than QGRW's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
WFIG vs. QGRW - Dividend Comparison
WFIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.89%, more than QGRW's 0.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund | 0.08% | 0.09% | 0.14% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WFIG WisdomTree U.S. Corporate Bond Fund | 4.89% | 4.82% | 4.67% | 4.19% | 4.25% | 2.50% | 2.61% | 3.00% | 3.27% | 2.88% | 2.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WFIG and QGRW have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QGRW has higher volatility (6.44%) compared to WFIG (1.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WFIG dropped -22.92% vs QGRW's -24.40%.
On 3-year performance, QGRW leads with 27.10% vs 5.20% for WFIG. On fees, WFIG is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, WFIG has been the lower-risk option at 1.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, QGRW has performed better with a 27.10% return vs 5.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
WFIG is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for QGRW.
WFIG has the higher dividend yield at 4.89%, compared with 0.08% for QGRW.
WFIG is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while QGRW is Large Cap Growth Equities. WFIG tracks WisdomTree Fundamental Corporate Bond Index, while QGRW tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for WFIG and 0.28% for QGRW.
QGRW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WFIG and QGRW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer