PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
WFIG vs. FLOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

WFIG vs. FLOT

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

WFIG (WisdomTree U.S. Corporate Bond Fund) and FLOT (iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WFIG is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the WisdomTree Fundamental Corporate Bond Index, while FLOT is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg US Floating Rate Note < 5 Years Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, WFIG returned 2.47%/yr vs 3.03%/yr for FLOT. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WFIG charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for FLOT.

Performance

WFIG vs. FLOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. Corporate Bond Fund (WFIG) and iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WFIG achieves a 0.19% return, which is significantly lower than FLOT's 1.87% return. Over the past 10 years, WFIG has underperformed FLOT with an annualized return of 2.47%, while FLOT has yielded a comparatively higher 3.03% annualized return.

WFIG

1D
-0.45%
1M
-0.38%
YTD
0.19%
6M
0.35%
1Y
5.27%
3Y*
5.20%
5Y*
0.50%
10Y*
2.47%

FLOT

1D
0.06%
1M
0.45%
YTD
1.87%
6M
2.18%
1Y
4.89%
3Y*
5.61%
5Y*
4.20%
10Y*
3.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WFIG vs. FLOT - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WFIG
WisdomTree U.S. Corporate Bond Fund		0.19%7.85%2.28%8.48%-16.25%-1.52%9.75%13.97%-2.01%7.00%
FLOT
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF		1.87%4.91%6.53%6.43%1.28%0.45%0.87%3.97%1.48%1.65%

Correlation

The correlation between WFIG and FLOT is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2016

0.12

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

WisdomTree U.S. Corporate Bond Fund

iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF

Often compared with WFIG:
WFIG vs. MILKWFIG vs. DXJWFIG vs. IBDRWFIG vs. NTSXWFIG vs. DBCWFIG vs. GDMNWFIG vs. QCON
Often compared with FLOT:
FLOT vs. SGOVFLOT vs. FLTRFLOT vs. USFRFLOT vs. FLRNFLOT vs. FLOA.LFLOT vs. NEARFLOT vs. IUSB

Return for Risk

WFIG vs. FLOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
WFIG
WFIG Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
WFIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WFIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
WFIG Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
WFIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
WFIG Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
FLOT
FLOT Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
FLOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLOT Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
FLOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLOT Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WFIG vs. FLOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Corporate Bond Fund (WFIG) and iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

WFIGFLOTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.28
6.59

-5.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.87
11.89

-10.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

3.24

-2.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.97

11.37

-9.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.12

105.76

-99.64

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WFIG vs. FLOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WFIG Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is lower than the FLOT Sharpe Ratio of 6.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WFIG and FLOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

WFIGFLOTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.28

6.59

-5.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

2.38

-2.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

0.73

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.66

-0.34

Drawdowns

WFIG vs. FLOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WFIG drawdown since its inception was -22.92%, which is greater than FLOT's maximum drawdown of -13.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WFIG and FLOT.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

WFIGFLOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.92%

-13.54%

-9.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.69%

-0.43%

-2.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.22%

-1.57%

-4.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.92%

-2.36%

-20.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.92%

-13.54%

-9.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.60%

-0.02%

-1.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.51%

-0.21%

-5.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.86%

0.05%

+0.81%

Volatility

WFIG vs. FLOT - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree U.S. Corporate Bond Fund (WFIG) has a higher volatility of 1.34% compared to iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT) at 0.21%. This indicates that WFIG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

WFIGFLOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.34%

0.21%

+1.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.08%

0.62%

+2.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.15%

0.74%

+3.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.13%

1.77%

+5.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.54%

4.15%

+3.39%

WFIG vs. FLOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

WFIG has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than FLOT's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

WFIG vs. FLOT - Dividend Comparison

WFIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.89%, more than FLOT's 4.54% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLOT
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF		4.54%4.84%5.82%5.66%2.06%0.43%1.25%2.78%2.41%1.46%0.97%0.53%
WFIG
WisdomTree U.S. Corporate Bond Fund		4.89%4.82%4.67%4.19%4.25%2.50%2.61%3.00%3.27%2.88%2.35%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

WFIG and FLOT have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WFIG has higher volatility (1.34%) compared to FLOT (0.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WFIG dropped -22.92% vs FLOT's -13.54%.

On 10-year performance, FLOT leads with 3.03% vs 2.47% for WFIG. On fees, FLOT is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, FLOT has been the lower-risk option at 0.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FLOT has performed better with a 3.03% return vs 2.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLOT is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for WFIG.

WFIG has the higher dividend yield at 4.89%, compared with 4.54% for FLOT.

WFIG is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while FLOT is Ultrashort Bond. WFIG tracks WisdomTree Fundamental Corporate Bond Index, while FLOT tracks Bloomberg US Floating Rate Note < 5 Years Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for WFIG and 0.15% for FLOT.

FLOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.59 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WFIG and FLOT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer