PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WFH vs. TINY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WFH vs. TINY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Work From Home ETF (WFH) and ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


WFH

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TINY

1D
2.63%
1M
15.50%
YTD
59.78%
6M
60.21%
1Y
114.15%
3Y*
31.25%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WFH vs. TINY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
WFH
Direxion Work From Home ETF
0.00%15.47%18.55%35.75%-45.26%-2.34%
TINY
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF
59.78%19.98%6.63%47.97%-34.14%8.73%

Correlation

The correlation between WFH and TINY is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2021

0.68

Over the past year, the correlation between WFH and TINY has dropped to 0.29 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

WFH vs. TINY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
WFH
TINY

Technology

86.2%
79.0%

Communication Services

9.4%

-

Consumer Cyclical

2.3%

-

Industrials

2.2%
4.7%

Basic Materials

-

7.7%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

8.6%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

WFH
86.2%
TINY
79.0%

Communication Services

WFH
9.4%
TINY

-

Consumer Cyclical

WFH
2.3%
TINY

-

Industrials

WFH
2.2%
TINY
4.7%

Basic Materials

WFH

-

TINY
7.7%

Consumer Defensive

WFH

-

TINY

-

Energy

WFH

-

TINY

-

Financial Services

WFH

-

TINY

-

Healthcare

WFH

-

TINY
8.6%

Real Estate

WFH

-

TINY

-

Utilities

WFH

-

TINY

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WFH vs. TINY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WFH

TINY
TINY Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
TINY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TINY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
TINY Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
TINY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
TINY Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WFH vs. TINY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Work From Home ETF (WFH) and ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

WFH vs. TINY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WFHTINYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

Drawdowns

WFH vs. TINY - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WFHTINYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.75%

Volatility

WFH vs. TINY - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WFHTINYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.37%

WFH vs. TINY - Expense Ratio Comparison

WFH has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than TINY's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

WFH vs. TINY - Dividend Comparison

WFH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, more than TINY's 0.18% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
TINY
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF
0.18%0.29%0.01%0.35%0.42%0.07%0.00%
WFH
Direxion Work From Home ETF
0.91%0.94%0.50%0.67%0.42%0.79%0.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


WFH and TINY have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, WFH is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WFH is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for TINY.

WFH has the higher dividend yield at 0.91%, compared with 0.18% for TINY.

WFH tracks Solactive Remote Work Index, while TINY tracks Solactive Nanotechnology Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WFH and 0.58% for TINY.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WFH and TINY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer