WFC vs. MTD
WFC (Wells Fargo & Company) and MTD (Mettler-Toledo International Inc.) are both stocks. WFC operates in Banks - Diversified (Financial Services), while MTD operates in Diagnostics & Research (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, WFC returned 8.95%/yr vs 11.73%/yr for MTD. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
WFC vs. MTD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WFC achieves a -9.20% return, which is significantly higher than MTD's -18.84% return. Over the past 10 years, WFC has underperformed MTD with an annualized return of 8.95%, while MTD has yielded a comparatively higher 11.73% annualized return.
WFC
- 1D
- 1.61%
- 1M
- 14.04%
- YTD
- -9.20%
- 6M
- -8.77%
- 1Y
- 18.25%
- 3Y*
- 28.38%
- 5Y*
- 15.64%
- 10Y*
- 8.95%
MTD
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- 9.68%
- YTD
- -18.84%
- 6M
- -18.81%
- 1Y
- -2.07%
- 3Y*
- -4.98%
- 5Y*
- -3.12%
- 10Y*
- 11.73%
WFC vs. MTD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WFC Wells Fargo & Company | -9.20% | 35.57% | 46.48% | 22.94% | -11.92% | 61.15% | -41.65% | 21.44% | -21.83% | 13.21% |
MTD Mettler-Toledo International Inc. | -18.84% | 13.93% | 0.88% | -16.08% | -14.83% | 48.92% | 43.67% | 40.26% | -8.71% | 48.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between WFC and MTD is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 1997 | 0.32 |
Fundamentals
WFC:
$269.39B
MTD:
$22.95B
WFC:
$6.73
MTD:
$42.68
WFC:
12.44
MTD:
26.51
WFC:
1.07
MTD:
4.07
WFC:
2.15
MTD:
5.67
WFC:
1.65
MTD:
6.26
WFC:
$125.70B
MTD:
$4.09B
WFC:
$81.14B
MTD:
$2.36B
WFC:
$31.58B
MTD:
$1.24B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WFC vs. MTD — Risk / Return Rank
WFC
MTD
WFC vs. MTD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) and Mettler-Toledo International Inc. (MTD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WFC | MTD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.00 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.68 | -0.15 | +0.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.54 | -0.42 | +1.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WFC vs. MTD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WFC drawdown since its inception was -79.01%, which is greater than MTD's maximum drawdown of -61.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WFC and MTD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WFC | MTD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.01% | -61.43% | -17.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.02% | -31.90% | +8.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.73% | -36.61% | +11.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.10% | -43.47% | +6.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.46% | -43.47% | -20.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.21% | -33.54% | +21.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.35% | -13.69% | -1.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.18% | 11.48% | -1.30% |
Volatility
WFC vs. MTD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) is 5.95%, while Mettler-Toledo International Inc. (MTD) has a volatility of 9.92%. This indicates that WFC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MTD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WFC | MTD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.95% | 9.92% | -3.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.95% | 26.16% | -6.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.75% | 32.17% | -5.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.23% | 32.15% | -1.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.28% | 29.78% | +2.50% |
Dividends
WFC vs. MTD - Dividend Comparison
WFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%, while MTD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTD Mettler-Toledo International Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WFC Wells Fargo & Company | 2.15% | 1.82% | 2.14% | 2.64% | 2.66% | 1.25% | 4.04% | 3.57% | 3.56% | 2.54% | 2.75% | 2.71% |
Financials
WFC vs. MTD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Wells Fargo & Company and Mettler-Toledo International Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
WFC vs. MTD - Profitability Comparison
WFC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wells Fargo & Company reported a gross profit of 20.31B and revenue of 31.80B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.9%.
MTD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mettler-Toledo International Inc. reported a gross profit of 555.82M and revenue of 947.13M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.7%.
WFC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wells Fargo & Company reported an operating income of 5.85B and revenue of 31.80B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.4%.
MTD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mettler-Toledo International Inc. reported an operating income of 246.22M and revenue of 947.13M, resulting in an operating margin of 26.0%.
WFC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wells Fargo & Company reported a net income of 5.29B and revenue of 31.80B, resulting in a net margin of 16.6%.
MTD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mettler-Toledo International Inc. reported a net income of 169.45M and revenue of 947.13M, resulting in a net margin of 17.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
WFC and MTD have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MTD has higher volatility (9.92%) compared to WFC (5.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WFC dropped -79.01% vs MTD's -61.43%.
WFC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.59 vs -0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WFC and MTD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer