MTD vs. EW
Compare and contrast key facts about Mettler-Toledo International Inc. (MTD) and Edwards Lifesciences Corporation (EW).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MTD or EW.
Correlation
The correlation between MTD and EW is 0.00. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Performance
MTD vs. EW - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
MTD:
36.94%
EW:
9.59%
MTD:
-2.54%
EW:
-1.90%
MTD:
-1.87%
EW:
-1.90%
Fundamentals
MTD:
$22.47B
EW:
$43.22B
MTD:
$40.00
EW:
$2.42
MTD:
27.02
EW:
30.45
MTD:
3.14
EW:
4.11
MTD:
5.87
EW:
7.83
MTD:
3.98K
EW:
4.27
MTD:
$3.83B
EW:
$5.54B
MTD:
$2.29B
EW:
$4.39B
MTD:
$1.20B
EW:
$1.77B
Returns By Period
MTD
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
EW
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MTD vs. EW — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
MTD
EW
MTD vs. EW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mettler-Toledo International Inc. (MTD) and Edwards Lifesciences Corporation (EW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
MTD vs. EW - Dividend Comparison
Neither MTD nor EW has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
MTD vs. EW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MTD drawdown since its inception was -2.54%, which is greater than EW's maximum drawdown of -1.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTD and EW. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Loading data...
Volatility
MTD vs. EW - Volatility Comparison
Loading data...
Financials
MTD vs. EW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mettler-Toledo International Inc. and Edwards Lifesciences Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MTD vs. EW - Profitability Comparison
MTD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Mettler-Toledo International Inc. reported a gross profit of 525.88M and revenue of 883.74M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.5%.
EW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Edwards Lifesciences Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.11B and revenue of 1.41B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 78.8%.
MTD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Mettler-Toledo International Inc. reported an operating income of 236.73M and revenue of 883.74M, resulting in an operating margin of 26.8%.
EW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Edwards Lifesciences Corporation reported an operating income of 409.90M and revenue of 1.41B, resulting in an operating margin of 29.0%.
MTD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Mettler-Toledo International Inc. reported a net income of 163.59M and revenue of 883.74M, resulting in a net margin of 18.5%.
EW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Edwards Lifesciences Corporation reported a net income of 358.00M and revenue of 1.41B, resulting in a net margin of 25.3%.