PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WFC vs. BX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

WFC vs. BX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) and Blackstone Inc. (BX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WFC achieves a -6.38% return, which is significantly higher than BX's -18.12% return. Over the past 10 years, WFC has underperformed BX with an annualized return of 8.96%, while BX has yielded a comparatively higher 21.56% annualized return.


WFC

1D
-1.35%
1M
5.02%
6M
-1.28%
YTD
-6.38%
1Y
9.41%
3Y*
26.50%
5Y*
16.28%
10Y*
8.96%
ALL TIME*
11.09%

BX

1D
-2.60%
1M
-0.15%
6M
-22.81%
YTD
-18.12%
1Y
-24.08%
3Y*
8.95%
5Y*
6.74%
10Y*
21.56%
ALL TIME*
12.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WFC vs. BX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WFC
Wells Fargo & Company
-6.38%35.57%46.48%22.94%-11.92%61.15%-41.65%21.44%-21.83%13.21%
BX
Blackstone Inc.
-18.12%-7.84%35.07%82.75%-40.01%107.11%19.78%96.33%0.10%27.34%

Correlation

The correlation between WFC and BX is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2007

0.46

The correlation between WFC and BX shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (1 year) to 0.47 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

WFC:

$264.23B

BX:

$148.46B

EPS

WFC:

$7.11

BX:

$3.90

PE Ratio

WFC:

12.13

BX:

31.66

PEG Ratio

WFC:

1.05

BX:

11.64

PS Ratio

WFC:

2.13

BX:

6.45

PB Ratio

WFC:

1.61

BX:

11.57

Total Revenue (TTM)

WFC:

$129.11B

BX:

$14.99B

Gross Profit (TTM)

WFC:

$83.28B

BX:

$13.12B

EBITDA (TTM)

WFC:

$33.13B

BX:

$7.37B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WFC vs. BX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WFC
WFC Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
WFC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WFC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
WFC Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
WFC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
WFC Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

BX
BX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
BX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
BX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
BX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
BX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WFC vs. BX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) and Blackstone Inc. (BX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WFCBXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

0.90

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.41

-0.54

+0.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.88

-0.92

+1.80

WFC vs. BX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WFC Sharpe Ratio is 0.36, which is higher than the BX Sharpe Ratio of -0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WFC and BX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WFC vs. BX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WFC drawdown since its inception was -79.01%, smaller than the maximum BX drawdown of -88.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WFC and BX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WFCBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.01%

-88.09%

+9.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.02%

-44.76%

+21.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.73%

-46.50%

+21.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.10%

-49.29%

+12.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.46%

-49.29%

-15.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.48%

-34.64%

+25.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.34%

-26.43%

+11.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.67%

26.32%

-15.65%

Volatility

WFC vs. BX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) is 7.53%, while Blackstone Inc. (BX) has a volatility of 10.28%. This indicates that WFC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WFCBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.53%

10.28%

-2.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.20%

29.17%

-8.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.61%

34.95%

-8.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.91%

39.55%

-9.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.30%

35.74%

-3.44%

Dividends

WFC vs. BX - Dividend Comparison

WFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%, less than BX's 4.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BX
Blackstone Inc.
4.02%3.04%2.00%2.54%6.66%2.76%2.95%3.43%8.12%7.25%6.14%11.76%
WFC
Wells Fargo & Company
2.09%1.82%2.14%2.64%2.66%1.25%4.04%3.57%3.56%2.54%2.75%2.71%

Financials

WFC vs. BX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Wells Fargo & Company and Blackstone Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00B35.00B20222023202420252026
33.59B
4.10B
(WFC) Total Revenue
(BX) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

WFC vs. BX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Wells Fargo & Company and Blackstone Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
64.6%
98.5%
Portfolio components
WFC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Wells Fargo & Company reported a gross profit of 21.71B and revenue of 33.59B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 64.6%.

BX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Blackstone Inc. reported a gross profit of 4.04B and revenue of 4.10B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 98.5%.

WFC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Wells Fargo & Company reported an operating income of 8.05B and revenue of 33.59B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.0%.

BX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Blackstone Inc. reported an operating income of 1.59B and revenue of 4.10B, resulting in an operating margin of 38.8%.

WFC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Wells Fargo & Company reported a net income of 6.41B and revenue of 33.59B, resulting in a net margin of 19.1%.

BX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Blackstone Inc. reported a net income of 649.73M and revenue of 4.10B, resulting in a net margin of 15.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


WFC and BX have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BX has higher volatility (10.28%) compared to WFC (7.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WFC dropped -79.01% vs BX's -88.09%.

WFC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.36 vs -0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WFC and BX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer