PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BX vs. CG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BX vs. CG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Blackstone Inc. (BX) and The Carlyle Group Inc. (CG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BX achieves a -15.38% return, which is significantly higher than CG's -21.07% return. Over the past 10 years, BX has outperformed CG with an annualized return of 22.48%, while CG has yielded a comparatively lower 15.81% annualized return.


BX

1D
-0.25%
1M
6.86%
6M
-8.42%
YTD
-15.38%
1Y
-23.46%
3Y*
9.46%
5Y*
5.49%
10Y*
22.48%
ALL TIME*
12.61%

CG

1D
1.46%
1M
8.72%
6M
-20.62%
YTD
-21.07%
1Y
-22.14%
3Y*
12.55%
5Y*
1.35%
10Y*
15.81%
ALL TIME*
10.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$746.59M$603.17M$618.74M
$125.47M$119.43M$152.66M

BX vs. CG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BX
Blackstone Inc.
-15.38%-7.84%35.07%82.75%-40.01%107.11%19.78%96.33%0.10%27.34%
CG
The Carlyle Group Inc.
-21.07%20.20%28.05%42.55%-43.78%78.46%1.62%116.75%-27.28%59.83%

Correlation

The correlation between BX and CG is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2012

0.64

The correlation between BX and CG shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (all time) to 0.76 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BX:

$154.30B

CG:

$16.57B

EPS

BX:

$6.00

CG:

$1.48

PE Ratio

BX:

21.30

CG:

31.15

PEG Ratio

BX:

7.83

CG:

0.19

PS Ratio

BX:

4.59

CG:

4.27

Total Revenue (TTM)

BX:

$16.32B

CG:

$3.99B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BX:

$13.72B

CG:

$2.92B

EBITDA (TTM)

BX:

$8.25B

CG:

$1.01B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BX vs. CG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BX
BX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
BX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
BX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
BX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
BX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

CG
CG Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
CG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
CG Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
CG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
CG Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BX vs. CG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blackstone Inc. (BX) and The Carlyle Group Inc. (CG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BXCGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

0.92

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.53

-0.55

+0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.87

-0.95

+0.07

BX vs. CG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BX Sharpe Ratio is -0.67, which is comparable to the CG Sharpe Ratio of -0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BX and CG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BX vs. CG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BX drawdown since its inception was -88.09%, which is greater than CG's maximum drawdown of -62.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BX and CG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BXCGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.09%

-62.69%

-25.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-44.76%

-40.36%

-4.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-46.50%

-40.36%

-6.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.29%

-56.75%

+7.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.29%

-56.75%

+7.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.45%

-32.27%

-0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.44%

-21.87%

-4.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.92%

23.42%

+3.50%

Volatility

BX vs. CG - Volatility Comparison

Blackstone Inc. (BX) has a higher volatility of 9.31% compared to The Carlyle Group Inc. (CG) at 8.71%. This indicates that BX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BXCGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.31%

8.71%

+0.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.89%

27.96%

+0.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.16%

36.50%

-1.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.56%

39.88%

-0.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.77%

37.46%

-1.69%

Dividends

BX vs. CG - Dividend Comparison

BX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.89%, more than CG's 3.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BX
Blackstone Inc.
3.89%3.04%2.00%2.54%6.66%2.76%2.95%3.43%8.12%7.25%6.14%11.76%
CG
The Carlyle Group Inc.
3.04%2.37%2.77%3.38%4.11%1.82%3.18%4.24%7.87%5.41%11.02%21.70%

Financials

BX vs. CG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Blackstone Inc. and The Carlyle Group Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


BX and CG have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BX has higher volatility (9.31%) compared to CG (8.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BX dropped -88.09% vs CG's -62.69%.

CG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.61 vs -0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BX and CG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer