PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WFBIX vs. MPBFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WFBIX vs. MPBFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund (WFBIX) and BNY Mellon Bond Fund (MPBFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WFBIX achieves a 0.21% return, which is significantly higher than MPBFX's -0.07% return. Over the past 10 years, WFBIX has outperformed MPBFX with an annualized return of 1.94%, while MPBFX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.54% annualized return.


WFBIX

1D
-0.22%
1M
0.11%
YTD
0.21%
6M
0.32%
1Y
4.53%
3Y*
5.26%
5Y*
0.87%
10Y*
1.94%

MPBFX

1D
-0.27%
1M
0.04%
YTD
-0.07%
6M
-0.03%
1Y
4.24%
3Y*
3.73%
5Y*
-0.23%
10Y*
1.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WFBIX vs. MPBFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WFBIX
iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund
0.21%7.16%1.43%9.65%-13.03%-1.79%7.40%8.72%-0.08%3.39%
MPBFX
BNY Mellon Bond Fund
-0.07%7.20%1.08%5.48%-13.55%-1.50%7.87%8.82%-0.53%3.91%

Correlation

The correlation between WFBIX and MPBFX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2000

0.93

The correlation between WFBIX and MPBFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WFBIX vs. MPBFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WFBIX
WFBIX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
WFBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WFBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
WFBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
WFBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
WFBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

MPBFX
MPBFX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
MPBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MPBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
MPBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
MPBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
MPBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WFBIX vs. MPBFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund (WFBIX) and BNY Mellon Bond Fund (MPBFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WFBIXMPBFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.23

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.70

1.68

+0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.08

5.13

-0.05

WFBIX vs. MPBFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WFBIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is comparable to the MPBFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WFBIX and MPBFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WFBIXMPBFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.30

1.28

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

-0.04

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

0.32

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.94

0.84

+0.11

Drawdowns

WFBIX vs. MPBFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WFBIX drawdown since its inception was -18.68%, roughly equal to the maximum MPBFX drawdown of -18.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WFBIX and MPBFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WFBIXMPBFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.68%

-18.40%

-0.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.02%

-2.87%

-0.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.09%

-6.18%

+0.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.84%

-18.40%

+0.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.68%

-18.40%

-0.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.71%

-2.81%

+1.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.26%

-2.41%

+0.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.01%

0.94%

+0.07%

Volatility

WFBIX vs. MPBFX - Volatility Comparison

iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund (WFBIX) and BNY Mellon Bond Fund (MPBFX) have volatilities of 1.31% and 1.33%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WFBIXMPBFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.31%

1.33%

-0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.80%

2.70%

+0.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.97%

3.78%

+0.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.40%

5.85%

+0.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.17%

4.84%

+0.33%

WFBIX vs. MPBFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WFBIX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than MPBFX's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

WFBIX vs. MPBFX - Dividend Comparison

WFBIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.91%, more than MPBFX's 3.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MPBFX
BNY Mellon Bond Fund
3.83%3.82%3.70%3.17%2.86%2.33%4.64%2.87%3.00%2.89%3.12%2.77%
WFBIX
iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund
3.91%3.78%3.68%6.82%2.60%2.04%2.43%2.88%2.71%2.24%2.25%2.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, WFBIX and MPBFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MPBFX has higher volatility (1.33%) compared to WFBIX (1.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WFBIX dropped -18.68% vs MPBFX's -18.40%.

WFBIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WFBIX and MPBFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer