WFBIX vs. FBND
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund (WFBIX) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND).
WFBIX is managed by Blackrock. It was launched on Jul 2, 1993. FBND is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 6, 2014.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: WFBIX or FBND.
Key characteristics
WFBIX | FBND | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 2.28% | 3.10% |
1Y Return | 11.37% | 12.53% |
3Y Return (Ann) | -1.93% | -1.03% |
5Y Return (Ann) | -0.03% | 1.13% |
10Y Return (Ann) | 1.47% | 2.29% |
Sharpe Ratio | 1.94 | 2.08 |
Sortino Ratio | 2.88 | 3.04 |
Omega Ratio | 1.35 | 1.38 |
Calmar Ratio | 0.67 | 0.85 |
Martin Ratio | 7.96 | 10.13 |
Ulcer Index | 1.48% | 1.28% |
Daily Std Dev | 6.08% | 6.25% |
Max Drawdown | -18.35% | -17.25% |
Current Drawdown | -7.95% | -4.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between WFBIX and FBND is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
WFBIX vs. FBND - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, WFBIX achieves a 2.28% return, which is significantly lower than FBND's 3.10% return. Over the past 10 years, WFBIX has underperformed FBND with an annualized return of 1.47%, while FBND has yielded a comparatively higher 2.29% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
WFBIX vs. FBND - Expense Ratio Comparison
WFBIX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than FBND's 0.36% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
WFBIX vs. FBND - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund (WFBIX) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
WFBIX vs. FBND - Dividend Comparison
WFBIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.51%, less than FBND's 4.63% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund | 3.51% | 3.16% | 2.60% | 2.23% | 2.65% | 2.88% | 2.71% | 2.24% | 2.25% | 2.20% | 2.56% | 5.61% |
Fidelity Total Bond ETF | 4.63% | 4.26% | 3.07% | 1.86% | 4.25% | 2.90% | 2.93% | 2.56% | 2.84% | 3.26% | 0.66% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
WFBIX vs. FBND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WFBIX drawdown since its inception was -18.35%, which is greater than FBND's maximum drawdown of -17.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WFBIX and FBND. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
WFBIX vs. FBND - Volatility Comparison
iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund (WFBIX) has a higher volatility of 1.42% compared to Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND) at 1.33%. This indicates that WFBIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.